通过PEB的Ldr参数（结构体定义为_PEB_LDR_DATA），遍历当前进程加载的模块信息链表，找到目标模块。
摘自PEB LDR DATA：
typedef struct _PEB_LDR_DATA
{
0x00 ULONG Length; /* Size of structure, used by ntdll.dll as structure version ID */
0x04 BOOLEAN Initialized; /* If set, loader data section for current process is initialized */
0x08 PVOID SsHandle;
0x0c LIST_ENTRY InLoadOrderModuleList; /* Pointer to LDR_DATA_TABLE_ENTRY structure. Previous and next module in load order */
0x14 LIST_ENTRY InMemoryOrderModuleList; /* Pointer to LDR_DATA_TABLE_ENTRY structure. Previous and next module in memory placement order */
0x1c LIST_ENTRY InInitializationOrderModuleList; /* Pointer to LDR_DATA_TABLE_ENTRY structure. Previous and next module in initialization order */
} PEB_LDR_DATA, *PPEB_LDR_DATA; // +0x24
_PEB_LDR_DATA结构体中的InLoadOrderModuleList、InMemoryOrderModuleList、InInitializationOrderModuleList指向一个当前进程加载模块的链表，链表的每个结点都被定义为_LIST_ENTRY类型的结构体，三条链表以不同方式串连，加载顺序、内存分布顺序、初始化顺序。
_LIST_ENTRY：
0:000> dt ntdll!_LIST_ENTRY
+0x000 Flink : Ptr32 _LIST_ENTRY
+0x004 Blink : Ptr32 _LIST_ENTRY
其中Flink指向下一结点，尾部结点的Flink则指向头部；Blink指向前一结点，首部节点指向尾部结点；所以该链表结构就是一个双向循环链表。
除头结点外，_LIST_ENTRY结构体中的两个指针都指向一个_LDR_DATA_TABLE_ENTRY结构体，看这情况也就是说_LDR_DATA_TABLE_ENTRY头部为_LIST_ENTRY咯？该结构体含有当前结点对应的模块的许多信息，根据成员BaseDllName匹配需要的已加载模块，再由DllBase得到句柄。
在通过InLoadOrderLinks进行模块查找时，Flink或者Blink可直接作为_LDR_DATA_TABLE_ENTRY地址；如果通过InMemoryOrderLinks 或InInitializationOrderLinks 进行匹配时，需要将F(B)link地址偏移-0x08或-0x10作为地址，与两者在_LDR_DATA_TABLE_ENTRY结构体中的偏移相对应。
0:000> dt ntdll!_LDR_DATA_TABLE_ENTRY
+0x000 InLoadOrderLinks : _LIST_ENTRY
+0x008 InMemoryOrderLinks : _LIST_ENTRY
+0x010 InInitializationOrderLinks : _LIST_ENTRY
+0x018 DllBase : Ptr32 Void
+0x01c EntryPoint : Ptr32 Void
+0x020 SizeOfImage : Uint4B
+0x024 FullDllName : _UNICODE_STRING
+0x02c BaseDllName : _UNICODE_STRING
+0x034 FlagGroup : [4] UChar
+0x034 Flags : Uint4B
+0x034 PackagedBinary : Pos 0, 1 Bit
+0x034 MarkedForRemoval : Pos 1, 1 Bit
+0x034 ImageDll : Pos 2, 1 Bit
+0x034 LoadNotificationsSent : Pos 3, 1 Bit
+0x034 TelemetryEntryProcessed : Pos 4, 1 Bit
+0x034 ProcessStaticImport : Pos 5, 1 Bit
+0x034 InLegacyLists : Pos 6, 1 Bit
+0x034 InIndexes : Pos 7, 1 Bit
+0x034 ShimDll : Pos 8, 1 Bit
+0x034 InExceptionTable : Pos 9, 1 Bit
+0x034 ReservedFlags1 : Pos 10, 2 Bits
+0x034 LoadInProgress : Pos 12, 1 Bit
+0x034 LoadConfigProcessed : Pos 13, 1 Bit
+0x034 EntryProcessed : Pos 14, 1 Bit
+0x034 ProtectDelayLoad : Pos 15, 1 Bit
+0x034 ReservedFlags3 : Pos 16, 2 Bits
+0x034 DontCallForThreads : Pos 18, 1 Bit
+0x034 ProcessAttachCalled : Pos 19, 1 Bit
+0x034 ProcessAttachFailed : Pos 20, 1 Bit
+0x034 CorDeferredValidate : Pos 21, 1 Bit
+0x034 CorImage : Pos 22, 1 Bit
+0x034 DontRelocate : Pos 23, 1 Bit
+0x034 CorILOnly : Pos 24, 1 Bit
+0x034 ChpeImage : Pos 25, 1 Bit
+0x034 ReservedFlags5 : Pos 26, 2 Bits
+0x034 Redirected : Pos 28, 1 Bit
+0x034 ReservedFlags6 : Pos 29, 2 Bits
+0x034 CompatDatabaseProcessed : Pos 31, 1 Bit
+0x038 ObsoleteLoadCount : Uint2B
+0x03a TlsIndex : Uint2B
+0x03c HashLinks : _LIST_ENTRY
+0x044 TimeDateStamp : Uint4B
+0x048 EntryPointActivationContext : Ptr32 _ACTIVATION_CONTEXT
+0x04c Lock : Ptr32 Void
+0x050 DdagNode : Ptr32 _LDR_DDAG_NODE
+0x054 NodeModuleLink : _LIST_ENTRY
+0x05c LoadContext : Ptr32 _LDRP_LOAD_CONTEXT
+0x060 ParentDllBase : Ptr32 Void
+0x064 SwitchBackContext : Ptr32 Void
+0x068 BaseAddressIndexNode : _RTL_BALANCED_NODE
+0x074 MappingInfoIndexNode : _RTL_BALANCED_NODE
+0x080 OriginalBase : Uint4B
+0x088 LoadTime : _LARGE_INTEGER
+0x090 BaseNameHashValue : Uint4B
+0x094 LoadReason : _LDR_DLL_LOAD_REASON
+0x098 ImplicitPathOptions : Uint4B
+0x09c ReferenceCount : Uint4B
+0x0a0 DependentLoadFlags : Uint4B
+0x0a4 SigningLevel : UChar
测试不调用系统API，利用PEB寻找模块，并通过模块寻找目标函数；这种情况大多是在Shellcode中用到，比方说恶意程序、病毒等；在许多情况下shellcode通常作为独立代码执行，不被加载器基址重定位，也无法直接调用API，所以通过PEB查找目标模块，进而查找目标函数，通常首先都会获取LoadLibraryA和GetProcAddress地址，便于之后直接加载指定模块，获取导出函数并调用。
写的时候我发现从函数序数表得到的函数序号减去序号基数base会得到不正确结果，不减则正确，代码调试时得到base值为1。
导出表结构：
typedef struct _IMAGE_EXPORT_DIRECTORY {
DWORD Characteristics;
DWORD TimeDateStamp;
WORD MajorVersion;
WORD MinorVersion;
DWORD Name;
DWORD Base;
DWORD NumberOfFunctions;
DWORD NumberOfNames;
DWORD AddressOfFunctions; // RVA from base of image
DWORD AddressOfNames; // RVA from base of image
DWORD AddressOfNameOrdinals; // RVA from base of image
} IMAGE_EXPORT_DIRECTORY, *PIMAGE_EXPORT_DIRECTORY;
测试代码，写的时候在通过模块获取函数地址的时候没用汇编，要提二进制码还得重写这个部分；不过顺便温习一下导出表结构。
#include "windows.h"
#include "stdio.h"
//typedef void(*func)();
VOID WINAPI Lower(WCHAR* s) {
WCHAR* pos = s;
for (; *pos; pos++) {
if (*pos <= 'Z' && *pos >= 'A')
*pos |= 0x20;
}
//printf(" ==lower string : %ws
", s);
}
BOOL WINAPI __strcmpW(WCHAR* a, WCHAR *b) {
//printf(" compared dll name: %ws
", b);
int i = 0;
for (i = 0; a[i] || b[i]; i++)
if (a[i] != b[i])
return FALSE;
return TRUE;
}
HMODULE WINAPI FindModuleByPeb(WCHAR* targetModule) {
WCHAR dllName[50] = { 0 };
BOOL foundModule = FALSE;
DWORD dllBase = NULL;
printf("[#] start get module handle
");
/*
通过PEB结构中的Ldr寻找到InLoadOrderModuleList，遍历寻找已加载的模块，通过模块名进行寻找
*/
__asm {
push targetModule
call Lower
mov eax, fs:[30h] // eax <- peb
mov eax, [eax + 0ch] // eax <- Ldr _PEB_LDR_DATA
mov eax, [eax + 0ch] // eax <- first Flink address, InLoadOrderModuleList [Type: _LIST_ENTRY]
_LOOP :
push eax
mov eax, [eax + 2ch + 4] // dll name string address
cmp eax, 0
jz _END // 字符串为NULL，说明寻找完毕，退出
lea ebx, dllName
push ebx // for calling compare
push ebx // for calling lower string
_COPYNAME :
mov dl, byte ptr[eax]
mov byte ptr[ebx], dl // copy name
add ebx, 2
add eax, 2
cmp[eax], 0
jnz _COPYNAME
mov[ebx], 0
call Lower // lower dll name string
push targetModule
call __strcmpW // compare dll name
cmp al, 1
jz _FOUND
pop eax
mov eax, [eax] // next Flink
jmp _LOOP // if not found, go to next flink and loop again
_FOUND :
pop eax
push DWORD ptr[eax + 18h] // save dllBase
pop dllBase
mov foundModule, 1 // found target dll
_END :
}
if (foundModule) {
printf(" [ok] Have found target module :)
");
printf(" DllBase : %#x
Dll Name: %ws
", dllBase, targetModule);
}
else
printf(" [no] Not found :(
");
return (HMODULE)dllBase;
}
func WINAPI GetProcByhMod(HMODULE hMod, WCHAR* procName) {
PIMAGE_DOS_HEADER pIDH = NULL; //DOS 头
PIMAGE_NT_HEADERS pINH = NULL; // NT头
PIMAGE_DATA_DIRECTORY pIDD = NULL; // 数据目录表
PIMAGE_EXPORT_DIRECTORY pIED = NULL; // 导出表
INT i = 0, length = 0;
WORD ordinal = -1;
DWORD funcAddr = NULL;
WCHAR funcName[60] = { 0 }; // 函数名字
CHAR *name = NULL;
pIDH = (PIMAGE_DOS_HEADER)hMod;
printf("[#]start Get Library By found module handle
");
if ((WORD)pIDH->e_magic == 0x5a4d) // magic值 MZ
printf(" Match "MZ" magic :)
");
else
printf(" Not Match "MZ" magic :(
");
pINH = (PIMAGE_NT_HEADERS)(pIDH->e_lfanew+(DWORD)hMod);
/*
printf("offset : %#x
", pIDH->e_lfanew);
printf("Image Base : %#x
", hMod);
printf("PIMAGE_NT_HEADERS value : %#x
", pINH);
*/
if ((WORD)pINH->Signature == 0x4550) // 签名 PE
printf(" Match "PE" signature :)
");
else
printf(" Not Match "PE" signature :(
");
pIDD = (PIMAGE_DATA_DIRECTORY)((pINH->OptionalHeader).DataDirectory); // 数据目录表
pIED = (PIMAGE_EXPORT_DIRECTORY)(pIDD[IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT].VirtualAddress + (DWORD)hMod);
printf(" export table VA : %#x
function names array address : %#x
", (DWORD)pIED, pIED->AddressOfNames + (DWORD)hMod);
Lower(procName); //
for (i = 0; i < pIED->NumberOfNames; i++) {
name = (CHAR*)(*((DWORD*)(pIED->AddressOfNames + (DWORD)hMod) + i) + (DWORD)hMod);
for (length = 0; name[length]; length++); // 函数名长度
/*printf("==> %s
", name);
通过functionames数组获取下标，根据该下标（输出函数名表和输出序号表一一对应）在输出序号表
获取函数地址表中的序号，将序号减去基数作为下标寻找到函数地址RVA。
*/
MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, NULL, name, ++length, funcName, length);
//printf(" compared function name : %ws
", funcName);
Lower(funcName);
if (__strcmpW(procName, funcName)) {
printf(" [ok] succeedfound function name :)
");
ordinal = *((WORD*)(pIED->AddressOfNameOrdinals + (DWORD)hMod) + i); // WORD
printf(" index of target function : %#x
ordinal number : %#x
orinal base : %#x
", i, ordinal, pIED->Base);
funcAddr = *((DWORD*)(pIED->AddressOfFunctions + (DWORD)hMod) + (ordinal/* - pIED->Base加上之后不对*/)) + (DWORD)hMod;
printf(" Get function address : %#x
", funcAddr);
break;
}
}
if (!funcAddr)
printf(" [no] not Found target function :(");
return (func)funcAddr;
}
INT main(INT argc, CHAR* argv[]) {
WCHAR searchMod[] = { L"Kernel32.dll" };
WCHAR procLoadlib[] = { L"LoadLibraryA" };
WCHAR procGetProc[] = { L"GetProcAddress" };
//func procAddr = NULL;
//
CHAR tarMod[] = { "User32.dll" };
CHAR targFunc[] = { "MessageBoxA" }; // 测试弹窗
CHAR test[] = { "test" };/////
/*HMODULE hMod = LoadLibraryA(tarMod);
typedef int (*msgBoxProc)(HWND, LPCTSTR, LPCTSTR, UINT);
msgBoxProc f = (msgBoxProc)GetProcAddress(hMod, targFunc);
f(NULL, (LPCTSTR)"test", (LPCTSTR)"test", MB_OK);*/
HMODULE hMod = FindModuleByPeb(searchMod);
if (hMod) {
__asm {
lea eax, procLoadlib
push eax //LoadLibraryA
push hMod
call GetProcByhMod
cmp eax, 0
jz _END2
mov ebx,eax
lea eax, tarMod // target mod; user32.dll
push eax
call ebx // call LoadLibraryA
cmp eax,0
jz _END2
push eax // save hInstance value
lea eax,procGetProc // string GetProcAddress
push eax
push hMod
call GetProcByhMod
cmp eax, 0
jz _END2
mov ebx, eax
lea eax, targFunc
pop edx
push eax // messageboxa
push edx // target hMod
call ebx // call getprocaddress
cmp eax, 0
jz _END2
mov ebx, eax
push MB_OK
lea eax, test
push eax
push eax
push 0 // param for messagebox
call ebx // call got api - messageboxA
_END2:
}
}
}