地址:http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/829060/Python-Code-Optimizations-Part-One
转发过来保存一下。喜欢精雕细琢,编程才有乐趣。作者牛。
Introduction
Listed below are some very common day to day usage scenarios, and a way to do them pythonically!
Using the Code
1. Looping over a Range of Numbers
for i in [0,1,2,3,4,5]:
print i**2
Better way (looks better):
for i in range(6):
print i**2
What Happens in this Loop?
range
produces a list in memory and then the for
loop loops over the list.
Both create a list of 6 integers in memory and then iterate over each
number, raise it to power 2 and then print. Thus, both the loops do
exactly the same thing in exactly the same way!
Pythonic way: Use xrange()
#Python 2.x for i in xrange(6): print i**2 #Python 3.x for i in range(6): print i**2
What is xrange?
xrange
is a sequence object that evaluates lazily.xrange
creates an iterator over the range(list) and yields one number at a time, thus consuming less amount of memory than the methods above.
2. Looping Over a Collection
colours = ['red', 'green', 'blue', 'yellow'] for i in range(len(colours)): print colours[i]
Pythonic way
for colour in colours: print colour
3. Looping Over a Collection and its Indices
for i in range(len(colours)): print i, '-->', colours[i]
Pythonic way: use enumerate()
for i, colour in enumerate(colours): print i, '-->', colour
4. Looping Backwards
for i in range(len(colours), -1, -1, -1): print colours[i]
Pythonic way: Use reversed()
for colour in reversed(colours): print colour
5. Loooping in Sorted Order
Pythonic way: Use sorted()
for colour in sorted(colours): print colour
Looping Backwards in Sorted Order
Just add reverse=True
to the sorted function arguments list.
Pythonic Way
for colour in sorted(colours, reverse=True): print colour
6. Looping Over Two Collections
names = ['a', 'b', 'c'] colours = ['red', 'green', 'blue', 'yellow'] n = min(len(colours), len(names)) for i in range(n): print names[i], '-->', colours[i]
Better Way
for name, colour in zip(names, colours): print name, '-->', colour
zip
creates a third list in memory which consists of tuples, each of which is its own separate object with pointers back to the original. In other words, it takes far more memory than the original two lists combined.
Most importantly "It doesn't scale!".
Pythonic Way: use izip()
from itertools import izip for name, colour in izip(names, colours): print name, '-->', colour
For smaller lists, zip
is faster, but if you have lists with millions of records, then better use izip
, as izip
only advances the underlying iterators when needed.