在MySQL数据库中出现了阻塞问题,如何快速查找定位问题根源?在实验开始前,我们先梳理一下有什么工具或命令查看MySQL的阻塞,另外,我们也要一一对比其优劣,因为有些命令可能在实际环境下可能并不适用。
1: show engine innodb status
2: Innotop工具
3: INNODB_TRX 等系统表
下面我们理论联系实际,通过实验来测试总结一下这个问题。首先构造测试环境,数据库测试环境为( 5.7.21 MySQL Community Server 和5.6.20-enterprise-commercial,这两个测试环境我都测试验证过)
mysql> use MyDB; Reading table information for completion of table and column names You can turn off this feature to get a quicker startup with -A Database changed mysql> create table test_blocking(id int primary key, name varchar(12)); Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.05 sec) mysql> insert into test_blocking -> select 1, 'kerry' from dual; Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql> insert into test_blocking -> select 2, 'jimmy' from dual; Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql> insert into test_blocking -> select 3, 'kkk' from dual; Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
准备好测试环境数据后,那么我们接下来开始实验,为了实验效果,我们先将参数innodb_lock_wait_timeout设置为100。
mysql> show variables like 'innodb_lock_wait_timeout'; +--------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +--------------------------+-------+ | innodb_lock_wait_timeout | 50 | +--------------------------+-------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> set global innodb_lock_wait_timeout=100 ; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql> select connection_id() from dual; +-----------------+ | connection_id() | +-----------------+ | 8 | +-----------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> set session autocommit=0; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from test_blocking where id=1 for update; +----+-------+ | id | name | +----+-------+ | 1 | kerry | +----+-------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
然后在第二个连接会话中执行更新脚本,构造被阻塞的案例
mysql> select connection_id() from dual; +-----------------+ | connection_id() | +-----------------+ | 9 | +-----------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> update test_blocking set name='kk' where id=1;
在第三个连接会话执行下面命令,查看TRANSACTIONS相关信息:
mysql> show engine innodb statusG;
clip_image001
使用show engine innodb status命令后,可以查看其输出的TRANSACTIONS部分信息,如上截图所示,找到类似TRX HAS BEEN WATING ...部分的信息,
通过那部分信息,我们可以看到update test_blocking set name='kk' where id=1这个SQL语句被阻塞了14秒,一直在等待获取X Lock。
TRANSACTIONS ------------ Trx id counter 148281 #下一个事务ID Purge done for trx's n:o < 148273 undo n:o < 0 state: running but idle History list length 552 LIST OF TRANSACTIONS FOR EACH SESSION: ---TRANSACTION 0, not started MySQL thread id 15, OS thread handle 0x4cc64940, query id 261 localhost root cleaning up ---TRANSACTION 0, not started MySQL thread id 14, OS thread handle 0x4cbe2940, query id 278 localhost root init show engine innodb status ---TRANSACTION 148280, ACTIVE 24 sec 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s) MySQL thread id 8, OS thread handle 0x4cba1940, query id 276 localhost root cleaning up ---TRANSACTION 148279, ACTIVE 313 sec starting index read mysql tables in use 1, locked 1 LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s) MySQL thread id 9, OS thread handle 0x4cc23940, query id 277 localhost root updating #线程ID为9, 操作系统线程句柄为0x4cc23940, 查询ID为277,账号为root的UPDATE操作 update test_blocking set name='kk' where id=1 #具体SQL语句 ------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 14 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED: #TRX等待授予锁已经有14秒了 RECORD LOCKS space id 337 page no 3 n bits 72 index `PRIMARY` of table `MyDB`.`test_blocking` trx id 148279 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waiting #在space id=337(test_blocking表的表空间),page no=3的页上,表test_blocking上的主键索引在等待X锁 Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80000001; asc ;; #第一个字段是主键,制度按长为4,值为1 1: len 6; hex 000000024322; asc C";; #该字段为6个字节的事务id,这个id表示最近一次被更新的事务id(对应十进制为148258) 2: len 7; hex 9a000001f20110; asc ;; #该字段为7个字节的回滚指针,用于mvcc 3: len 5; hex 6b65727279; asc kerry;; #该字段表示的是此记录的第二个字段,长度为5,值为kerry(如果表有多个字段,那么此处后面还有记录)
mysql> select * from information_schema.INNODB_SYS_DATAFILES where space=337; +-------+--------------------------+ | SPACE | PATH | +-------+--------------------------+ | 337 | ./MyDB/test_blocking.ibd | +-------+--------------------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql>
但是这种方式也有一些弊端,例如生产环境很复杂,尤其是有大量事务的情况下。诸多信息根本无法清晰判断知道谁阻塞了谁;其次一点也不直观; 另外,这个也无法定位blocker 的SQL语句。这种方式只能作为辅助分析用途,通过查看取锁的详细信息,帮助进一步诊断问题。
2: Innotop工具
如下所示,Innotop工具很多情况下也不能定位到阻塞的语句(Blocking Query), 也仅仅能获取一些锁相关信息
3:通过查询information_schema数据库下与事务相关的几个系统表
还是构造之前的测试案例,在第一个会话中使用SELECT FOR UPDATE锁定其中一行记录
mysql> use MyDB; Database changed mysql> set session autocommit=0; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql> select connection_id() from dual; +-----------------+ | connection_id() | +-----------------+ | 17 | +-----------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from test_blocking where id=1 for update; +----+-------+ | id | name | +----+-------+ | 1 | kerry | +----+-------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql>
然后在第二个连接会话中执行更新脚本,构造被阻塞的案例
mysql> use MyDB; Database changed mysql> select connection_id() from dual; +-----------------+ | connection_id() | +-----------------+ | 19 | +-----------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> update test_blocking set name='kk' where id=1;
此时阻我们在第三个连接会话查找谁被阻塞了
SELECT b.trx_mysql_thread_id AS 'blocked_thread_id' ,b.trx_query AS 'blocked_sql_text' ,c.trx_mysql_thread_id AS 'blocker_thread_id' ,c.trx_query AS 'blocker_sql_text' ,( Unix_timestamp() - Unix_timestamp(c.trx_started) ) AS 'blocked_time' FROM information_schema.innodb_lock_waits a INNER JOIN information_schema.innodb_trx b ON a.requesting_trx_id = b.trx_id INNER JOIN information_schema.innodb_trx c ON a.blocking_trx_id = c.trx_id WHERE ( Unix_timestamp() - Unix_timestamp(c.trx_started) ) > 4; SELECT a.sql_text, c.id, d.trx_started FROM performance_schema.events_statements_current a join performance_schema.threads b ON a.thread_id = b.thread_id join information_schema.processlist c ON b.processlist_id = c.id join information_schema.innodb_trx d ON c.id = d.trx_mysql_thread_id where c.id=17 ORDER BY d.trx_startedG;
如下截图所示,第一个SQL语句能够查到线程19 被线程 17阻塞了, 被阻塞的SQL语句为“update test_blocking set name='kk' where id=1;”, 能够查到被阻塞了多长时间,但是无法查到源头SQL语句。此时就需要第二个SQL语句登场,找到源头语句。
但是不要太天真的认为第二个SQL语句能够获取所有场景下的阻塞源头SQL语句,实际业务场景,会话可能在执行一个存储过程或复杂的业务,有可能它执行完阻塞源头SQL后,继续在执行其它SQL语句,此时,你抓取的是这个连接会话最后执行的SQL语句,如下所示,我简单构造了一个例子。就能构造这样的一个场景。这个我曾经写过一篇博客“为什么数据库有时候不能定位阻塞(Blocker)源头的SQL语句”,分析SQL Server和ORACLE 定位查找阻塞源头SQL语句,现在看来真是大道同源,殊途同归。
mysql> select * from test_blocking where id=1 for update; +----+-------+ | id | name | +----+-------+ | 1 | kerry | +----+-------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> delete from student where stu_id=1001; Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) mysql>
总结: 最简单、方便的还是上面两个SQL查询定位blocker的SQL语句,但是需要注意:有时候它也查不到真正阻塞的源头SQL语句。所以还需结合应用程序代码与上下文环境进行整体分析、判断!
作者:潇湘隐者
出处:http://www.cnblogs.com/kerrycode/
更多资料详情可关注二维码获取
更多精彩内容也可查看 https://xdclass.net/#/index