• 【转】Contrary to the answers here, you DON'T need to worry about encoding!


    For those goals, I honestly do not understand why people keep telling you that you need the encodings. You certainly do NOT need to worry about encodings for this.

    Just do this instead:

    static byte[] GetBytes(string str)
    {
        byte[] bytes = new byte[str.Length * sizeof(char)];
        System.Buffer.BlockCopy(str.ToCharArray(), 0, bytes, 0, bytes.Length);
        return bytes;
    }
    
    static string GetString(byte[] bytes)
    {
        char[] chars = new char[bytes.Length / sizeof(char)];
        System.Buffer.BlockCopy(bytes, 0, chars, 0, bytes.Length);
        return new string(chars);
    }

    As long as your program (or other programs) don't try to interpret the bytes somehow, which you obviously didn't mention you intend to do, then there is nothing wrong with this approach! Worrying about encodings just makes your life more complicated for no real reason.

    Additional benefit to this approach:

    It doesn't matter if the string contains invalid characters, because you can still get the data and reconstruct the original string anyway!

    It will be encoded and decoded just the same, because you are just looking at the bytes.

    If you used a specific encoding, though, it would've given you trouble with encoding/decoding invalid characters.

  • 相关阅读:
    array_unshift() 、
    readfile() 函数
    Java的异常处理
    Java 接口
    Java 抽象类
    final关键字
    statice关键字
    dom查询
    JS 正则表达式
    JS对象
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/xiangniu/p/4255314.html
Copyright © 2020-2023  润新知