编码规范是老生常谈的问题,现在再看代码规范可能不会再去在意变量,控件的命名方法等,而是更加关注代码的实用性。
首先我们要明白一下几点,
1.代码写出来除了让他跑起来还有个非常非常重要的作用是维护,因为没有一成不变的代码,需求变化代码就不可避免的要变化。
2.你不是一个人在写代码,你身后有一个团队,这个团队中任何一个人都有可能会改你的代码,你如果写的不规范,后面的人会跟着写。举一个例子,最初的代码可能是这样的,
if (OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "CZ-SP") { OrderCostAndWeightEntity e = new OrderCostAndWeightEntity(); e.FlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel); e = ReGetFlight.GetDirectFlightHighWeightEntity(OrderInfo.O_FlightEntity, "", e.FlightAgency); e.Sendticketcity = int.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SendticketcityOfDirectFlights_HU"].ToString()); regetFlightInitData.HighCostAndWeightEntity = e; regetFlightInitData.TicketType = "0001"; //如果是海航,则不需要政策倒查验证 regetFlightInitData.ReSearchNoFlight = false; } else { OrderCostAndWeightEntity e = new OrderCostAndWeightEntity(); e.Sendticketcity = int.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SendticketcityOfDirectFlights_HU"].ToString()); e.FlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel); e.CostRate1 = 1.0M; regetFlightInitData.HighCostAndWeightEntity = e; //如果是海航,则不需要政策倒查验证 regetFlightInitData.ReSearchNoFlight = false; }
但是过一时间又来个需求,对于“MU-WS”也需要走上面的逻辑,你会怎么写,如果你只是完成任务可能会像下面这样写
if (OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "CZ-SP" || OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "MU-WS") { OrderCostAndWeightEntity e = new OrderCostAndWeightEntity(); e.FlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel); e = ReGetFlight.GetDirectFlightHighWeightEntity(OrderInfo.O_FlightEntity, "", e.FlightAgency); e.Sendticketcity = int.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SendticketcityOfDirectFlights_HU"].ToString()); regetFlightInitData.HighCostAndWeightEntity = e; regetFlightInitData.TicketType = "0001"; //如果是海航,则不需要政策倒查验证 regetFlightInitData.ReSearchNoFlight = false; } else { OrderCostAndWeightEntity e = new OrderCostAndWeightEntity(); e.Sendticketcity = int.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SendticketcityOfDirectFlights_HU"].ToString()); e.FlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel); e.CostRate1 = 1.0M; regetFlightInitData.HighCostAndWeightEntity = e; //如果是海航,则不需要政策倒查验证 regetFlightInitData.ReSearchNoFlight = false; }
如果真的这么写你就是始作俑者,后面的人如果都和你一样就都会朝着葫芦画瓢,最后代码可能会是这样的
if (OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "CZ-SP" || OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "MU-WS" || OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "MU-WS" || OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "MU-SP" || OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "CZ-WS" || OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "XT-WS") { OrderCostAndWeightEntity e = new OrderCostAndWeightEntity(); e.FlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel); e = ReGetFlight.GetDirectFlightHighWeightEntity(OrderInfo.O_FlightEntity, "", e.FlightAgency); e.Sendticketcity = int.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SendticketcityOfDirectFlights_HU"].ToString()); regetFlightInitData.HighCostAndWeightEntity = e; regetFlightInitData.TicketType = "0001"; //如果是海航,则不需要政策倒查验证 regetFlightInitData.ReSearchNoFlight = false; } else { OrderCostAndWeightEntity e = new OrderCostAndWeightEntity(); e.Sendticketcity = int.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SendticketcityOfDirectFlights_HU"].ToString()); e.FlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel); e.CostRate1 = 1.0M; regetFlightInitData.HighCostAndWeightEntity = e; //如果是海航,则不需要政策倒查验证 regetFlightInitData.ReSearchNoFlight = false; }
看到效果了么,你需要脱一下下面的那个长条才能看到全部代码,这就是你的“因”种下后得到的果实。所以我们需要改进,常见的改进是回车换行,保证所有的代码都在你一眼能够看到的范围之内。改进后代码如下:
if (OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "CZ-SP" || OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "MU-WS" || OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "MU-WS" || OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "MU-SP" || OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "CZ-WS" || OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper() == "XT-WS") { OrderCostAndWeightEntity e = new OrderCostAndWeightEntity(); e.FlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel); e = ReGetFlight.GetDirectFlightHighWeightEntity(OrderInfo.O_FlightEntity, "", e.FlightAgency); e.Sendticketcity = int.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SendticketcityOfDirectFlights_HU"].ToString()); regetFlightInitData.HighCostAndWeightEntity = e; regetFlightInitData.TicketType = "0001"; //如果是海航,则不需要政策倒查验证 regetFlightInitData.ReSearchNoFlight = false; } else { OrderCostAndWeightEntity e = new OrderCostAndWeightEntity(); e.Sendticketcity = int.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SendticketcityOfDirectFlights_HU"].ToString()); e.FlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel); e.CostRate1 = 1.0M; regetFlightInitData.HighCostAndWeightEntity = e; //如果是海航,则不需要政策倒查验证 regetFlightInitData.ReSearchNoFlight = false;
是不是清爽一点,好看一点,如果你在第一次修改代码的时候这样写后面的人就会跟着这样写,他们可能会想,前面一个人这样写这样写应该不会有问题,虽然代码看起来有点别扭,这时候我们可以带着鉴赏的眼光看这段代码,如果再想一想还有更好的方法,为何不用switch呢?
switch (OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper()) { case "CZ-SP": case "MU-SP": case "XT-WS": { OrderCostAndWeightEntity e = new OrderCostAndWeightEntity(); e.FlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel); e = ReGetFlight.GetDirectFlightHighWeightEntity(OrderInfo.O_FlightEntity, "", e.FlightAgency); e.Sendticketcity = int.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SendticketcityOfDirectFlights_HU"].ToString()); regetFlightInitData.HighCostAndWeightEntity = e; regetFlightInitData.TicketType = "0001"; //如果是海航,则不需要政策倒查验证 regetFlightInitData.ReSearchNoFlight = false; break; } default: { OrderCostAndWeightEntity e = new OrderCostAndWeightEntity(); e.Sendticketcity = int.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SendticketcityOfDirectFlights_HU"].ToString()); e.FlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(OrderInfo.O_OrdersEntity.DirectFlightChannel); e.CostRate1 = 1.0M; regetFlightInitData.HighCostAndWeightEntity = e; //如果是海航,则不需要政策倒查验证 regetFlightInitData.ReSearchNoFlight = false; break; } }
是不是更加简单,如果你这样写,后面的人会毫不犹豫地在后面加一个case “”:因为这个是大家再熟悉不过的语法了,丝毫不用怀疑这种写法的正确性,于是我们可以带着欣赏的眼光来看这段代码了。
3.要承认我们的心智就这么多,脑袋就这么大,我们既不能一目十行也不能出口成章,所以不要写一言看不出什么意思的代码。
以上的想法都是建立在维护别人代码的痛苦,失落,沮丧,各种不爽,各种吐槽之上,所以代码规范是需要我们时刻关注的,在这里自己总结一些规范,告诫自己不要做始作俑者。
1.一个文件中只放一个类,类名同文件名,不要在一个文件中写好几个类,这样看的清楚。
2.不要在一个文件中写多于500行的代码,除了那些比较大的实体类。其实我还想说超过500行看起来就有点累,但是在我们的系统中超过10000行的代码比比皆是。
3.一个方法的代码不要超过100行,其实我想说超过50行的方法看起来就有点累。但是在我们的系统中超过200行代码的方法比比皆是。
4.存储过程的代码也不要超过100行,不要在存储过程中写过多的业务逻辑,那是找死,但是在我们的系统中我还真他妈的见过10000多行的存储过程,好宏伟啊!
5.避免写超过5个参数的方法,如果有请使用一个类或者结构来传。
6.一个方法只有一个return result; ,不要多次return结果,最好给返回结果赋值,最后return result;
7.不要给很简单的代码加注释,会有噪音的,会让人误解的,因为你写的大多数情况下很片面。
8.记录日志的时候不要到处都记,有条件的情况下针对客户一次操作(比如下单)只记录一条日志。
另外再这里列举自己对代码做的一些改进,不足之处欢迎大家指出。
1.参数过长使用缩进
a. //获得保险策略信息 insuranceStrategy = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyInsurance(appFltEntity.ProductSource.ToString(), strategyFlightAgency.ToString(), "", appFltEntity.Price.ToString(), appFltEntity.DirectFlightChannel, appFltEntity.Airline.DibitCode, appFltEntity.Flight, appFltEntity.DepartAirport.Code, appFltEntity.ArriveAirport.Code, appFltEntity.SubClass, appFltEntity.DepartTime, appFltEntity.DepartTime.Date, null); b. //获得保险策略信息 insuranceStrategy = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyInsurance(appFltEntity.ProductSource.ToString(), strategyFlightAgency.ToString(), "", appFltEntity.Price.ToString(), appFltEntity.DirectFlightChannel, appFltEntity.Airline.DibitCode, appFltEntity.Flight, appFltEntity.DepartAirport.Code, appFltEntity.ArriveAirport.Code, appFltEntity.SubClass, appFltEntity.DepartTime, appFltEntity.DepartTime.Date, null);
2.if条件过长中使用缩进
a. if (IsDirectFlight && (this.CorpPayType == ExpenseType.OWN || this.AccountInfo.DirectOrdersQuoteMode == "I")) { strategyFlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(appFltEntity.DirectFlightChannel); //根据票台获得票台对应的城市 strategyCityID = InsuranceCommon.GetFlightAgencyCity(strategyFlightAgency); } b. if (IsDirectFlight && (this.CorpPayType == ExpenseType.OWN || this.AccountInfo.DirectOrdersQuoteMode == "I")) { strategyFlightAgency = InsuranceCommon.GetStrategyFlightAgencyNew(appFltEntity.DirectFlightChannel); //根据票台获得票台对应的城市 strategyCityID = InsuranceCommon.GetFlightAgencyCity(strategyFlightAgency); }
3.使用三元表达式
a. if (InsuranceInfoList != null && InsuranceInfoList.Count > 0 && InsuranceInfoList[0].GeneralDescription.Contains("e路泰康")) collections.Set("IsElderCanBuyInsurance", "T"); else collections.Set("IsElderCanBuyInsurance", "F"); b. collections.Set("IsElderCanBuyInsurance", InsuranceInfoList != null && InsuranceInfoList.Count > 0 && InsuranceInfoList[0].GeneralDescription.Contains("e路泰康") ? "T" : "F");
4.使用蓝不大表达式
a. InsuranceInfoList = InsuranceInfoList.FindAll(delegate(BookingInsuranceInfo iInfo) { return iInfo.TypeID == "C2C30"; }); b. InsuranceInfoList = InsuranceInfoList.FindAll(a => a.TypeID == "C2C30");
5.使用switch表达式,见上面。
6.使用数组包含
a. if (wsFlt.ProductSource == 4 && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(wsFlt.DirectFlightChannel) && (wsFlt.DirectFlightChannel.ToUpper() == "HO-WS" or wsFlt.DirectFlightChannel.ToUpper() == "ZH-WS" or wsFlt.DirectFlightChannel.ToUpper() == "XT-WS") && directFlightCorporationList != null && directFlightCorporationList.Count > 0 && !directFlightCorporationList.Contains(corporationid)) { return false; } b. if (wsFlt.ProductSource == 4 && new List<string>() { "HO-WS", "CZ-WS", "XT-WS" }.Contains(wsFlt.DirectFlightChannel.Trim().ToUpper()) && directFlightCorporationList != null && directFlightCorporationList.Count > 0 && !directFlightCorporationList.Contains(corporationid)) { return false; }
可以看到代码中也使用了缩进。
欢迎大家也列举自己遇到的代码简洁之道。