本章主要分析 公开属性与私有属性提供公开get、set方法两种方式对比
// Degenerate classes like this should not be public! class Point { public double x; public double y; }
// Public class with exposed immutable fields - questionable public final class Time { private static final int HOURS_PER_DAY = 24; private static final int MINUTES_PER_HOUR = 60; public final int hour; public final int minute; public Time(int hour, int minute) { if (hour < 0 || hour >= HOURS_PER_DAY) throw new IllegalArgumentException("Hour: " + hour); if (minute < 0 || minute >= MINUTES_PER_HOUR) throw new IllegalArgumentException("Min: " + minute); this.hour = hour; this.minute = minute; } ... // Remainder omitted }
Certainly, the hard-liners are correct when it comes to public classes:
if a class is accessible outside its package, provide accessor methods, to preserve the
flexibility to change the class’s internal representation. If a public class exposes its
data fields, all hope of changing its representation is lost, as client code can be distributed
far and wide.
如果我们直接公开域,我们将无法对属性进行限制,这样会导致,在调用该处的代码都要添加上限制,而修改次数随着调用的次数而增加,
如果我们提供get,set方法,就能容易的在set方法内对传入参数进行限制。