不知你是否见过 try { } finally { }
代码中,try
块留空,而只往 finally
中写代码的情况呢?这种写法有其特殊的目的。
本文就来说说这种不一样的写法。
你可以点开这个链接查看 Exception
类,在里面你可以看到一段异常处理的代码非常奇怪:
// 代码已经过简化。
internal void RestoreExceptionDispatchInfo(ExceptionDispatchInfo exceptionDispatchInfo)
{
// 省略代码。
try{}
finally
{
// 省略代码。
}
// 省略代码。
}
神奇之处就在于,其 try
块是空的,重要代码都放在 finally
中。那为什么会这么写呢?
在代码注释中的解释为:
We do this inside a
finally
clause to ensureThreadAbort
cannot be injected while we have taken the lock. This is to prevent unrelated exception restorations from getting blocked due to TAE.
翻译过来是:
在 finally
子句中执行此操作以确保在获取锁时无法注入 ThreadAbort
。这是为了防止不相关的异常恢复因 TAE 而被阻止。
也就是说,此方法是为了与 Thread.Abort
对抗,防止 Thread.Abort
中断此处代码的执行。Thread.Abort
的执行交给 CLR 管理,finally
的执行也是交给 CLR 管理。CLR 确保 finally
块执行的时候不会被 Thread.Abort
阻止。
代码在 .NET Core 和 .NET Framework 中的实现完全一样:
// This is invoked by ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw to restore the exception stack trace, corresponding to the original throw of the
// exception, just before the exception is "rethrown".
[SecuritySafeCritical]
internal void RestoreExceptionDispatchInfo(System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo exceptionDispatchInfo)
{
bool fCanProcessException = !(IsImmutableAgileException(this));
// Restore only for non-preallocated exceptions
if (fCanProcessException)
{
// Take a lock to ensure only one thread can restore the details
// at a time against this exception object that could have
// multiple ExceptionDispatchInfo instances associated with it.
//
// We do this inside a finally clause to ensure ThreadAbort cannot
// be injected while we have taken the lock. This is to prevent
// unrelated exception restorations from getting blocked due to TAE.
try{}
finally
{
// When restoring back the fields, we again create a copy and set reference to them
// in the exception object. This will ensure that when this exception is thrown and these
// fields are modified, then EDI's references remain intact.
//
// Since deep copying can throw on OOM, try to get the copies
// outside the lock.
object _stackTraceCopy = (exceptionDispatchInfo.BinaryStackTraceArray == null)?null:DeepCopyStackTrace(exceptionDispatchInfo.BinaryStackTraceArray);
object _dynamicMethodsCopy = (exceptionDispatchInfo.DynamicMethodArray == null)?null:DeepCopyDynamicMethods(exceptionDispatchInfo.DynamicMethodArray);
// Finally, restore the information.
//
// Since EDI can be created at various points during exception dispatch (e.g. at various frames on the stack) for the same exception instance,
// they can have different data to be restored. Thus, to ensure atomicity of restoration from each EDI, perform the restore under a lock.
lock(Exception.s_EDILock)
{
_watsonBuckets = exceptionDispatchInfo.WatsonBuckets;
_ipForWatsonBuckets = exceptionDispatchInfo.IPForWatsonBuckets;
_remoteStackTraceString = exceptionDispatchInfo.RemoteStackTrace;
SaveStackTracesFromDeepCopy(this, _stackTraceCopy, _dynamicMethodsCopy);
}
_stackTraceString = null;
// Marks the TES state to indicate we have restored foreign exception
// dispatch information.
Exception.PrepareForForeignExceptionRaise();
}
}
}
你可以在 这里 查看 .NET Framework 版本,在这里 查看 .NET Core 的版本。
参考资料
- exception.cs - Reference Source
- RestoreExceptionDispatchInfo
- The empty try block mystery - Some Creativity
- c# - Why use try {} finally {} with an empty try block? - Stack Overflow
- corefx/System.Runtime.cs at master · dotnet/corefx
原文地址: https://walterlv.com/post/empty-try-block.html
作者:吕毅