• MySQL查询性能、EXPLAIN执行计划


    首先,是这么一段执行时间24秒的sql:

    SQL 1:

    SELECT
    	d.id,
    	d.project_code,
    	d.push_type,
    	d.push_name,
    	d.push_to,
    	d.push_from,
    	d.push_way,
    	tr.isread,
    	d.push_content,
    	d.push_attachment,
    	d.add_time,
    	d.push_status,
    	d.push_reviewer,
    	push_time,
    	d.reviewer_time,
    	d.push_class,
    	d.rel_object,
    	p.short_name AS project_name,
    	u1. NAME AS push_to_name,
    	u2. NAME AS push_from_name,
    	u3. NAME AS push_reviewer_name
    FROM tb_push_data d
        LEFT JOIN tb_project p ON p.short_code = d.project_code
        LEFT JOIN tb_user u1 ON u1. CODE = d.push_to
        LEFT JOIN tb_user u2 ON u2. CODE = d.push_from
        LEFT JOIN tb_user u3 ON u3. CODE = d.push_reviewer
        LEFT JOIN tb_push_log tr ON tr.pushdata_id = d.id
    WHERE 1 = 1
        AND d.add_time BETWEEN '2017-01-01' and '2018-01-11'
    GROUP BY d.id
    LIMIT 0,100
    
    受影响的行: 0
    时间: 24.933s
    

    可以看到,仅仅是100条数据,查询时间竟然高达24秒,于是我尝试将左外连接改为交叉连接:

    SQL 2:

    SELECT
    	d.id,
    	d.project_code,
    	d.push_type,
    	d.push_name,
    	d.push_to,
    	d.push_from,
    	d.push_way,
    	tr.isread,
    	d.push_content,
    	d.push_attachment,
    	d.add_time,
    	d.push_status,
    	d.push_reviewer,
    	push_time,
    	d.reviewer_time,
    	d.push_class,
    	d.rel_object,
    	p.short_name AS project_name,
    	u1. NAME AS push_to_name,
    	u2. NAME AS push_from_name,
    	u3. NAME AS push_reviewer_name
    FROM 
    	tb_push_data d,
    	tb_project p,
    	tb_user u1,
    	tb_user u2,
    	tb_user u3,
    	tb_push_log tr
    WHERE 1 = 1
    	and p.short_code = d.project_code
    	and u1. CODE = d.push_to
    	and u2. CODE = d.push_from
    	and u3. CODE = d.push_reviewer
    	and tr.pushdata_id = d.id
    	AND d.add_time BETWEEN '2017-01-01' and '2018-01-11'
    GROUP BY d.id
    LIMIT 0,100
    
    受影响的行: 0
    时间: 0.189s
    

    这一下查询时间终于算是正常了,看来很多人说的数据库查询不用外键不用join还是有道理的。
    但是这又出现了一个问题,因为SQL 2没有使用外连接,比如我某条数据是没有推送人的,那这条记录都显示不出来了。

    那么,针对目前的这种情况,该如何优化?

    首先,我陷入了两个误区:

    1. 这个限制了只返回100条,并不是满足条件的只有100条,所以不能说数据量小
    2. 至于 LEFT JOIN交叉连接,两者意义不一样,查询计划不一样,满足条件的数据量也不一样,所以没有可比性。需要的数据出不来了,所以明显是少了,少了数据,速度变更快不正常么?

    解决方案

    对于这种优化的问题,应该先拿到执行计划:EXPLAIN
    也就是在查询sql的前面加上EXPLAIN,得到如下结果:

    image_1c3kruqi21t54mq211d911715s7m.png-41.8kB

    可以看到,LEFT JOIN tb_push_log tr ON tr.pushdata_id = d.id 这个没走索引,而且看起来数据量不少,那么就要先在上面加索引试试:

    alter table tb_push_log add key(pushdata_id)
    

    问题解决!

  • 相关阅读:
    JOIN条件限制对结果记录的影响
    什么是linux?
    什么是操作系统?
    Internship settled!
    Python dict 调试技巧 —— 利用YAML存储dict内容
    c++ 异常处理
    C#可空类型
    C# 异常处理
    C#值类型与引用类型
    C# 类类型
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/VitoYi/p/8277026.html
Copyright © 2020-2023  润新知