require('babel-polyfill'); //测试用例要在执行完了truffle compile和truffle migrate后才能使用truffle test来进行测试 //要注意artifacts只有在truffle框架里能使用 var CryptoPunksMarket = artifacts.require("./CryptoPunksMarket.sol"); //要注意contract只有在truffle框架里能使用,mocha中使用describe块开始 contract('CryptoPunksMarket-setInitial', function (accounts) { //it为测试用例,是同步进行访问的,前面的string是用来解释该测试用例的测试目的是什么 it("Should start with 0 balance", async function () { //声明使用的是truffle migrate部署好后的CryptoPunksMarket智能合约 var contract = await CryptoPunksMarket.deployed(); //然后调用里面的setInitialOwner初始化用户函数,将punk0的拥有者设为accounts[0] await contract.setInitialOwner(accounts[0], 0); //然后通过查看得到用户accounts[0]拥有的token数量 var balance = await contract.balanceOf.call(accounts[0]); //这就是chai的断言部分,查看balance.valueOf()是否与1相等,如果是,则继续向下运 //行,如果不成功将会输出错误信息Didn't get the initial punk,而且该测试用例it回结 //束,最后会标明出错 assert.equal(balance.valueOf(), 1, "Didn't get the initial punk"); //查看punkIndex为0的拥有者是谁 var owner = await contract.punkIndexToAddress.call(0); //拥有者应该是accounts[0],否则报错 assert.equal(owner, accounts[0], "Ownership array wrong"); //初始化punk有10000个,分配一个给accounts[0]后,应该还剩9999个 var remaining = await contract.punksRemainingToAssign.call(); assert.equal(9999, remaining); // todo Set this back to 10000 for final runs var assignCoins = 100; //给用户accounts[0]分配99个punk,包括之前那个,应该有100个 for (var i=1; i<assignCoins; i++) { await contract.setInitialOwner(accounts[0], i); } //所以现在剩余的punk有10000-100个 var remainingAfter = await contract.punksRemainingToAssign.call(); assert.equal(10000-assignCoins, remainingAfter); var balanceAfter = await contract.balanceOf.call(accounts[0]); assert.equal(assignCoins, balanceAfter); }), //该用例也是用来分配punk的 it("bulk assign", async function () { //该声明使用的合约与上面的测试用例是一样的,但是这里我会遇见一个问题,就是根据 //这个函数运行的逻辑来看,该it是在上面的it结束后才运行的,这样才能保证此时被分配 //的punk有110个,我们truffle test运行起来后发现的确是成功的,但是如果我们没有 //truffle的框架中运行的话,it其实是会同步运行的,所以我想可能是truffle在包装的时候 //进行了设置,所以它没有使用describe测试套件,而是使用了自定义的contract,这是我 //还存疑的地方 var contract = await CryptoPunksMarket.deployed(); var owners = [accounts[0], accounts[1], accounts[2], accounts[3], accounts[4], accounts[5], accounts[6], accounts[7], accounts[8], accounts[9]]; var punks = [1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009]; await contract.setInitialOwners(owners, punks); for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) { var currentOwner = await contract.punkIndexToAddress.call(punks[i]); assert.equal(currentOwner, owners[i]); } var remainingAfter = await contract.punksRemainingToAssign.call(); assert.equal(10000-110, remainingAfter); }), it("can not pass an invalid index to assign initial", async function () { var contract = await CryptoPunksMarket.deployed(); try { await contract.setInitialOwner(accounts[0], 10000); assert(false, "Should have thrown exception."); } catch (err) { // Should catch an exception } }), it("only owner can assign initial", async function () { var contract = await CryptoPunksMarket.deployed(); try { await contract.setInitialOwner(accounts[1], 1); assert(false, "Should have thrown exception."); } catch (err) { // Should catch an exception } }), it("Can not claim punk after set initial owners assigned", async function () { var contract = await CryptoPunksMarket.deployed(); await contract.allInitialOwnersAssigned(); try { await contract.setInitialOwner(accounts[0], 0); assert(false, "Should have thrown exception."); } catch (err) { // Should catch an exception } }) });
上面这个就是测试代码cryptopunksmarket-setinitial.js及其一些解释