• Laplacian matrix(转)


    转自:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplacian_matrix#Deformed_Laplacian

    Laplacian matrix

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    In the mathematical field of graph theory, the Laplacian matrix, sometimes called admittance matrix, Kirchhoff matrix or discrete Laplacian, is a matrix representation of a graph. Together with Kirchhoff's theorem, it can be used to calculate the number of spanning trees for a given graph. The Laplacian matrix can be used to find many other properties of the graph. Cheeger's inequality from Riemannian geometry has a discrete analogue involving the Laplacian matrix; this is perhaps the most important theorem in spectral graph theory and one of the most useful facts in algorithmic applications. It approximates the sparsest cut of a graph through the second eigenvalue of its Laplacian.

    Contents

    Definition

    Given a simple graph G with n vertices, its Laplacian matrix L_{n 	imes n} is defined as:[1]

    
L = D - A,

    where D is the degree matrix and A is the adjacency matrix of the graph. In the case of directed graphs, either the indegree or outdegree might be used, depending on the application.

    The elements of L are given by

    L_{i,j}:=
egin{cases}
deg(v_i) & mbox{if} i = j \
-1 & mbox{if} i 
eq j mbox{and} v_i mbox{ is adjacent to } v_j \
0 & mbox{otherwise}
end{cases}

    where deg(vi) is degree of the vertex i.

    The symmetric normalized Laplacian matrix is defined as:[1]

    
L^{	ext{sym}} := D^{-1/2} L D^{-1/2}= I - D^{-1/2} A D^{-1/2},

    The elements of L^{	ext{sym}} are given by

    L^{	ext{sym}}_{i,j}:=
egin{cases}
1 & mbox{if} i = j mbox{and} deg(v_i) 
eq 0\
-frac{1}{sqrt{deg(v_i)deg(v_j)}} & mbox{if} i 
eq j mbox{and} v_i mbox{ is adjacent to } v_j \
0 & mbox{otherwise}.
end{cases}

    The random-walk normalized Laplacian matrix is defined as:

    L^{	ext{rw}} := D^{-1}L = I - D^{-1}A

    The elements of L^{	ext{rw}} are given by

    L^{	ext{rw}}_{i,j}:=
egin{cases}
1 & mbox{if} i = j mbox{and} deg(v_i) 
eq 0\
-frac{1}{deg(v_i)} & mbox{if} i 
eq j mbox{and} v_i mbox{ is adjacent to } v_j \
0 & mbox{otherwise}.
end{cases}

    Example

    Here is a simple example of a labeled graph and its Laplacian matrix.

    Labeled graphDegree matrixAdjacency matrixLaplacian matrix
    6n-graf.svg left(egin{array}{rrrrrr}
 2 &  0 &  0 &  0 &  0 &  0\
 0 &  3 &  0 &  0 &  0 &  0\
 0 &  0 &  2 &  0 &  0 &  0\
 0 &  0 &  0 &  3 &  0 &  0\
 0 &  0 &  0 &  0 &  3 &  0\
 0 &  0 &  0 &  0 &  0 &  1\
end{array}
ight) left(egin{array}{rrrrrr}
 0 &  1 &  0 &  0 &  1 &  0\
 1 &  0 &  1 &  0 &  1 &  0\
 0 &  1 &  0 &  1 &  0 &  0\
 0 &  0 &  1 &  0 &  1 &  1\
 1 &  1 &  0 &  1 &  0 &  0\
 0 &  0 &  0 &  1 &  0 &  0\
end{array}
ight) left(egin{array}{rrrrrr}
 2 & -1 &  0 &  0 & -1 &  0\
-1 &  3 & -1 &  0 & -1 &  0\
 0 & -1 &  2 & -1 &  0 &  0\
 0 &  0 & -1 &  3 & -1 & -1\
-1 & -1 &  0 & -1 &  3 &  0\
 0 &  0 &  0 & -1 &  0 &  1\
end{array}
ight)

    Properties

    For an (undirected) graph G and its Laplacian matrix L with eigenvalues lambda_0 le lambda_1 le cdots le lambda_{n-1}:

    • L is symmetric..
    • L is positive-semidefinite (that is lambda_i ge 0 for all i). This is verified in the incidence matrix section (below). This can also be seen from the fact that the Laplacian is symmetric and diagonally dominant.
    • L is an M-matrix (its off-diagonal entries are nonpositive, yet the real parts of its eigenvalues are nonnegative).
    • Every row sum and column sum of L is zero. Indeed, in the sum, the degree of the vertex is summed with a "-1" for each neighbor.
    • In consequence, lambda_0=0, because the vector mathbf{v}_0=(1,1,dots,1) satisfies L mathbf{v}_0 = mathbf{0} .
    • The number of times 0 appears as an eigenvalue in the Laplacian is the number of connected components in the graph.
    • The smallest non-zero eigenvalue of L is called the spectral gap.
    • The second smallest eigenvalue of L is the algebraic connectivity (or Fiedler value) of G.
    • The Laplacian is an operator on the n-dimensional vector space of functions f : V → mathbb{R}, where V is the vertex set of G, and n = |V|.
    • When G is k-regular, the normalized Laplacian is: mathcal{L} = 	frac{1}{k} L = I - 	frac{1}{k} A, where A is the adjacency matrix and I is an identity matrix.
    • For a graph with multiple connected components, L is a block diagonal matrix, where each block is the respective Laplacian matrix for each component, possibly after reordering the vertices (i.e. L is permutation-similar to a block diagonal matrix).
    • Laplacian matrix is singular.

    Incidence matrix

    Define an |e| x |v| oriented incidence matrix M with element Mev for edge e (connecting vertex i and j, with i > j) and vertex v given by

    M_{ev} = left{ egin{array}{rl}1, & 	ext{if}\,v=i\-1, & 	ext{if}\,v=j\0, & 	ext{otherwise}.end{array}
ight.

    Then the Laplacian matrix L satisfies

    L = M^	ext{T} M\,,

    where M^	ext{T} is the matrix transpose of M.

    Now consider an eigendecomposition of L, with unit-norm eigenvectors mathbf{v}_i and corresponding eigenvalues lambda_i:

    
egin{align}
lambda_i & = mathbf{v}_i^T L mathbf{v}_i \
& = mathbf{v}_i^T M^T M mathbf{v}_i \
& = (M mathbf{v}_i)^T (M mathbf{v}_i). \
end{align}

    Because lambda_i can be written as the inner product of the vector M mathbf{v}_i with itself, this shows that lambda_i ge 0 and so the eigenvalues of L are all non-negative.

    Deformed Laplacian

    The deformed Laplacian is commonly defined as

    Delta(s)=I-sA+s^2(D-I)

    where I is the unit matrix, A is the adjacency matrix, and D is the degree matrix, and s is a (complex-valued) number. Note that the standard Laplacian is just Delta(1).[2]

    Symmetric normalized Laplacian

    The (symmetric) normalized Laplacian is defined as

    L^{	ext{sym}}:= D^{-1/2} L D^{-1/2} = I-D^{-1/2}AD^{-1/2}

    where L is the (unnormalized) Laplacian, A is the adjacency matrix and D is the degree matrix. Since the degree matrix D is diagonal and positive, its reciprocal square root D^{-1/2} is just the diagonal matrix whose diagonal entries are the reciprocals of the positive square roots of the diagonal entries of D. The symmetric normalized Laplacian is a symmetric matrix.

    One has: L^{	ext{sym}} = S S^{*}, where S is the matrix whose rows are indexed by the vertices and whose columns are indexed by the edges of G such that each column corresponding to an edge e = {u, v} has an entry frac{1}{sqrt d_{u}} in the row corresponding to u, an entry -frac{1}{sqrt d_{v}} in the row corresponding to v, and has 0 entries elsewhere. (Note: S^{*} denotes the transpose of S).

    All eigenvalues of the normalized Laplacian are real and non-negative. We can see this as follows. Since L^{	ext{sym}} is symmetric, its eigenvalues are real. They are also non-negative: consider an eigenvector g of L^{	ext{sym}} with eigenvalue λ and suppose  g = D^{1/2} f . (We can consider g and f as real functions on the vertices v.) Then:

    
lambda  {} =  {}
frac{langle g,L^{	ext{sym}}g
angle}{langle g, g
angle} 
 {} =  {}
frac{langle g, D^{-1/2} L D^{-1/2} g
angle}{langle g,g
angle} 
 {} =  {}
frac{langle f, Lf
angle}{langle D^{1/2} f, D^{1/2} f
angle} 
 {} =  {}
frac{sum_{usim v}(f(u) - f(v) )^2}{sum_{v} f(v)^2 d_{v}} 
 >  0,

    where we use the inner product langle f,g
angle = sum_{v} f(v)g(v), a sum over all vertices v, and sum_{usim v} denotes the sum over all unordered pairs of adjacent vertices {u,v}. The quantity sum_{u,v}(f(u) - f(v) )^2 is called the Dirichlet sum of f, whereas the expression 
frac{langle g,L^{	ext{sym}}g
angle}{langle g, g
angle} 
is called the Rayleigh quotient of g.

    Let 1 be the function which assumes the value 1 on each vertex. Then D^{1/2} 1 is an eigenfunction of L^{	ext{sym}} with eigenvalue 0.[3]

    In fact, the eigenvalues of the normalized symmetric Laplacian satisfy 0 = μ0≤...≤ μn-1≤ 2. These eigenvalues (known as the spectrum of the normalized Laplacian) relate well to other graph invariants for general graphs.[4]

    Random walk normalized Laplacian

    The random walk normalized Laplacian is defined as

    L^{	ext{rw}} := D^{-1} L

    where A is the Adjacency matrix and D is the degree matrix. Since the degree matrix D is diagonal, its inverse D^{-1} is simply defined as a diagonal matrix, having diagonal entries which are the reciprocals of the corresponding positive diagonal entries of D. For the isolated vertices (those with degree 0), a common choice is to set the corresponding element L^{	ext{rw}}_{i,i} to 0. This convention results in a nice property that the multiplicity of the eigenvalue 0 is equal to the number of connected components in the graph. The matrix elements of L^{	ext{rw}} are given by

    L^{	ext{rw}}_{i,j}:=
egin{cases}
1 & mbox{if} i = j mbox{and} deg(v_i) 
eq 0\
-frac{1}{deg(v_i)} & mbox{if} i 
eq j mbox{and} v_i mbox{ is adjacent to } v_j \
0 & mbox{otherwise}.
end{cases}

    The name of the random-walk normalized Laplacian comes from the fact that this matrix is simply the transition matrix of a random walker on the graph. For example let  e_i denote the i-th standard basis vector, then x = e_i L^{	ext{rw}} is a probability vector representing the distribution of a random-walker's locations after taking a single step from vertex i. i.e. x_j = mathbb{P}(v_i 	o v_j). More generally if the vector  x is a probability distribution of the location of a random-walker on the vertices of the graph then x' = x (L^{	ext{rw}})^t is the probability distribution of the walker after t steps.

    One can check that

    L^{	ext{rw}}=D^{-frac12}left( I - L^{	ext{sym}}
ight) D^{frac12},

    i.e., L^{	ext{rw}} is similar to the normalized Laplacian L^{	ext{sym}}. For this reason, even if L^{	ext{rw}} is in general not hermitian, it has real eigenvalues. Indeed, its eigenvalues agree with those of L^{	ext{sym}} (which is hermitian) up to a reflection about 1/2.

    In some of the literature, the matrix I-D^{-1} A is also referred to as the random-walk Laplacian since its properties approximate those of the standard discrete Laplacian from numerical analysis.

    Graphs

    As an aside about random walks on graphs, consider a simple undirected graph. Consider the probability that the walker is at the vertex i at time t, given the probability distribution that he was at vertex j at time t-1 (assuming a uniform chance of taking a step along any of the edges attached to a given vertex):

    
p_i(t) = sum_j frac{A_{ij}}{deg(v_j)} p_j(t-1),

    or in matrix-vector notation:

    
p(t) = A D^{-1} p(t-1).

    (Equilibrium, which sets in as t
ightarrow infty, is defined by p = A D^{-1} p .)

    We can rewrite this relation as

    
egin{align}
D^{-frac12} p(t) & = left[ D^{-frac12} A D^{-frac12} 
ight] D^{-frac12} p(t-1).
end{align}

    A_{reduced} equiv D^{-frac12} A D^{-frac12} is a symmetric matrix called the reduced adjacency matrix. So, taking steps on this random walk requires taking powers of A_{reduced}, which is a simple operation because A_{reduced} is symmetric.

    Interpretation as the discrete Laplace operator

    The Laplacian matrix can be interpreted as a matrix representation of a particular case of the discrete Laplace operator. Such an interpretation allows one, e.g., to generalise the Laplacian matrix to the case of graphs with an infinite number of vertices and edges, leading to a Laplacian matrix of an infinite size.

    To expand upon this, we can "describe"[why?] the change of some element phi_i (with some constant k) as[why?]

    
egin{align}
frac{d phi_i}{d t} & = -k sum_j A_{ij} (phi_i - phi_j) \
& = -k phi_i sum_j A_{ij} + k sum_j A_{ij} phi_j \
& = - k phi_i  deg(v_i) + k sum_j A_{ij} phi_j \
& = - k sum_j (delta_{ij}  deg(v_i) - A_{ij} ) phi_j \
& = -k sum_j (ell_{ij} ) phi_j.
end{align}

    In matrix-vector notation,

    
egin{align}
frac{d phi}{d t} & = -k(D-A)phi \
& = -k L phi,
end{align}

    which gives

    
egin{align}
frac{d phi}{d t} + kLphi = 0.
end{align}

    Notice that this equation takes the same form as the heat equation, where the matrix L is replacing the Laplacian operator 
abla^2; hence, the "graph Laplacian".

    To find a solution to this differential equation, apply standard techniques for solving a first-order matrix differential equation. That is, write phi as a linear combination of eigenvectors mathbf{v}_i of L (so that Lmathbf{v}_i = lambda_i mathbf{v}_i), with time-dependent 
egin{align}
phi = sum_i c_i mathbf{v}_i.
end{align}

    Plugging into the original expression (note that we will use the fact that because L is a symmetric matrix, its unit-norm eigenvectors mathbf{v}_i are orthogonal):

    
egin{align}
frac{d (sum_i c_i mathbf{v}_i)}{d t} + kL(sum_i c_i mathbf{v}_i) & = 0 \
sum_i left[ frac{d c_i}{d t} mathbf{v}_i + k c_i L mathbf{v}_i 
ight] & = \
sum_i left[ frac{d c_i}{d t} mathbf{v}_i + k c_i lambda_i mathbf{v}_i 
ight] & = \
frac{d c_i}{d t} + k lambda_i c_i & = 0, \
end{align}

    whose solution is

    
egin{align}
c_i(t) = c_i(0) exp(-k lambda_i t).
end{align}

    As shown before, the eigenvalues lambda_i of L are non-negative, showing that the solution to the diffusion equation approaches an equilibrium, because it only exponentially decays or remains constant. This also shows that given lambda_i and the initial condition c_i(0), the solution at any time t can be found.[5]

    To find c_i(0) for each i in terms of the overall initial condition phi(0), simply project phi(0) onto the unit-norm eigenvectors mathbf{v}_i;

    c_i(0) = langle phi(0), mathbf{v}_i 
angle .

    In the case of undirected graphs, this works because L is symmetric, and by the spectral theorem, its eigenvectors are all orthogonal. So the projection onto the eigenvectors of L is simply an orthogonal coordinate transformation of the initial condition to a set of coordinates which decay exponentially and independently of each other.

    Equilibrium Behavior

    To understand lim_{t 	o infty}phi(t), note that the only terms  c_i(t) = c_i(0) exp(-k lambda_i t) that remain are those where lambda_i = 0, since

    lim_{t 	o infty} exp(-k lambda_i t) = left{ egin{array}{rlr}0 & 	ext{if}  &lambda_i > 0 \ 1 & 	ext{if} & lambda_i = 0 end{array} 
ight}

    In other words, the equilibrium state of the system is determined completely by the kernel of L. Since by definition, sum_{j}L_{ij} = 0, the vector mathbf{v}^1 of all ones is in the kernel. Note also that if there are k disjoint connected components in the graph, then this vector of all ones can be split into the sum of k independent lambda = 0 eigenvectors of ones and zeros, where each connected component corresponds to an eigenvector with ones at the elements in the connected component and zeros elsewhere.

    The consequence of this is that for a given initial condition c(0) for a graph with N vertices

    lim_{t 	o infty}phi(t) = langle c(0), mathbf{v^1} 
angle  mathbf{v^1}

    where

    mathbf{v^1} = frac{1}{sqrt{N}} [1, 1, ..., 1]

    For each element phi_j of phi, i.e. for each vertex j in the graph, it can be rewritten as

     lim_{t 	o infty}phi_j(t) = frac{1}{N} sum_{i = 1}^N c_i(0) .

    In other words, at steady state, the value of phi converges to the same value at each of the vertices of the graph, which is the average of the initial values at all of the vertices. Since this is the solution to the heat diffusion equation, this makes perfect sense intuitively. We expect that neighboring elements in the graph will exchange energy until that energy is spread out evenly throughout all of the elements that are connected to each other.

    Example of the Operator on a Grid

     
    This GIF shows the progression of diffusion, as solved by the graph laplacian technique. A graph is constructed over a grid, where each pixel in the graph is connected to its 8 bordering pixels. Values in the image then diffuse smoothly to their neighbors over time via these connections. This particular image starts off with three strong point values which spill over to their neighbors slowly. The whole system eventually settles out to the same value at equilibrium.

    This section shows an example of a function phi diffusing over time through a graph. The graph in this example is constructed on a 2D discrete grid, with points on the grid connected to their eight neighbors. Three initial points are specified to have a positive value, while the rest of the values in the grid are zero. Over time, the exponential decay acts to distribute the values at these points evenly throughout the entire grid.

    The complete Matlab source code that was used to generate this animation is provided below. It shows the process of specifying initial conditions, projecting these initial conditions onto the eigenvalues of the Laplacian Matrix, and simulating the exponential decay of these projected initial conditions.

    N = 20;%The number of pixels along a dimension of the image
    A = zeros(N, N);%The image
    Adj = zeros(N*N, N*N);%The adjacency matrix
    
    %Use 8 neighbors, and fill in the adjacency matrix
    dx = [-1, 0, 1, -1, 1, -1, 0, 1];
    dy = [-1, -1, -1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1];
    for x = 1:N
       for y = 1:N
           index = (x-1)*N + y;
           for ne = 1:length(dx)
               newx = x + dx(ne);
               newy = y + dy(ne);
               if newx > 0 && newx <= N && newy > 0 && newy <= N
                   index2 = (newx-1)*N + newy;
                   Adj(index, index2) = 1;
               end
           end
       end
    end
    
    %%%BELOW IS THE KEY CODE THAT COMPUTES THE SOLUTION TO THE DIFFERENTIAL
    %%%EQUATION
    Deg = diag(sum(Adj, 2));%Compute the degree matrix
    L = Deg - Adj;%Compute the laplacian matrix in terms of the degree and adjacency matrices
    [V, D] = eig(L);%Compute the eigenvalues/vectors of the laplacian matrix
    D = diag(D);
    
    %Initial condition (place a few large positive values around and
    %make everything else zero)
    C0 = zeros(N, N);
    C0(2:5, 2:5) = 5;
    C0(10:15, 10:15) = 10;
    C0(2:5, 8:13) = 7;
    C0 = C0(:);
    
    C0V = V'*C0;%Transform the initial condition into the coordinate system 
    %of the eigenvectors
    for t = 0:0.05:5
       %Loop through times and decay each initial component
       Phi = C0V.*exp(-D*t);%Exponential decay for each component
       Phi = V*Phi;%Transform from eigenvector coordinate system to original coordinate system
       Phi = reshape(Phi, N, N);
       %Display the results and write to GIF file
       imagesc(Phi);
       caxis([0, 10]);
       title(sprintf('Diffusion t = %3f', t));
       frame = getframe(1);
       im = frame2im(frame);
       [imind, cm] = rgb2ind(im, 256);
       if t == 0
          imwrite(imind, cm, 'out.gif', 'gif', 'Loopcount', inf, 'DelayTime', 0.1); 
       else
          imwrite(imind, cm, 'out.gif', 'gif', 'WriteMode', 'append', 'DelayTime', 0.1);
       end
    end
    

    Approximation to the negative continuous Laplacian

    The graph Laplacian matrix can be further viewed as a matrix form of an approximation to the (positive semi-definite) Laplacian operator obtained by the finite difference method.[6] In this interpretation, every graph vertex is treated as a grid point; the local connectivity of the vertex determines the finite difference approximation stencil at this grid point, the grid size is always one for every edge, and there are no constraints on any grid points, which corresponds to the case of the homogeneous Neumann boundary condition, i.e., free boundary.

    In Directed Multigraphs

    An analogue of the Laplacian matrix can be defined for directed multigraphs.[7] In this case the Laplacian matrix L is defined as

    L = D - A

    where D is a diagonal matrix with Di,i equal to the outdegree of vertex i and A is a matrix with Ai,j equal to the number of edges from i to j (including loops).

    See also

    References

     
    • Weisstein, Eric W., "Laplacian Matrix", MathWorld.
    • "The Deformed Consensus Protocol", F. Morbidi, Automatica, vol. 49, n. 10, pp. 3049-3055, October 2013.
    • Chung, Fan R.K. (1997). Spectral graph theory (Repr. with corr., 2. [pr.] ed.). Providence, RI: American Math. Soc. ISBN 0-8218-0315-8.
    • Chung, Fan (1997) [1992]. Spectral Graph Theory. American Mathematical Society. ISBN 0821803158.
    • Newman, Mark (2010). Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0199206651.
    • Smola, Alexander J.; Kondor, Risi (2003), "Kernels and regularization on graphs", Learning Theory and Kernel Machines: 16th Annual Conference on Learning Theory and 7th Kernel Workshop, COLT/Kernel 2003, Washington, DC, USA, August 24-27, 2003, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2777, Springer, pp. 144–158, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45167-9_12.
    1. Chaiken, S. and Kleitman, D. (1978). "Matrix Tree Theorems". Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 24 (3): 377–381. doi:10.1016/0097-3165(78)90067-5. ISSN 0097-3165.
    • T. Sunada, Discrete geometric analysis, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, (ed. by P. Exner, J. P. Keating, P. Kuchment, T. Sunada, A. Teplyaev), 77 (2008), 51-86.
    • B. Bollobaás, Modern Graph Theory, Springer-Verlag (1998, corrected ed. 2013), ISBN 0-387-98488-7, Chapters II.3 (Vector Spaces and Matrices Associated with Graphs), VIII.2 (The Adjacency Matrix and the Laplacian), IX.2 (Electrical Networks and Random Walks).
  • 相关阅读:
    CSS------制作一个带+-的input框
    rest简介
    flask之flask-login登陆验证(一)
    Python之异常设计(一)
    flask之flask-sqlalchemy(一)
    flask之wtforms 表单验证(一)
    三 Django模型层之Meta
    二 Djano模型层之模型字段选项
    一 Django模型层简介
    Django之路由、模板和模型系统 (转载)
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/topW2W/p/5186918.html
Copyright © 2020-2023  润新知