This section describes the testing support provided by Spring Security.
To use the Spring Security test support, you must include spring-security-test-4.2.10.RELEASE.jar as a dependency of your project.
11. Testing Method Security
This section demonstrates how to use Spring Security’s Test support to test method based security. We first introduce a MessageService that requires the user to be authenticated in order to access it.
public class HelloMessageService implements MessageService {
@PreAuthorize("authenticated")
public String getMessage() {
Authentication authentication = SecurityContextHolder.getContext()
.getAuthentication();
return "Hello " + authentication;
}
}
The result of getMessage is a String saying "Hello" to the current Spring Security Authentication. An example of the output is displayed below.
Hello org.springframework.security.authentication.UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken@ca25360: Principal: org.springframework.security.core.userdetails.User@36ebcb: Username: user; Password: [PROTECTED]; Enabled: true; AccountNonExpired: true; credentialsNonExpired: true; AccountNonLocked: true; Granted Authorities: ROLE_USER; Credentials: [PROTECTED]; Authenticated: true; Details: null; Granted Authorities: ROLE_USER
11.1 Security Test Setup
Before we can use Spring Security Test support, we must perform some setup. An example can be seen below:
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) 1
@ContextConfiguration 2
public class WithMockUserTests {
This is a basic example of how to setup Spring Security Test. The highlights are:
1、@RunWith instructs the spring-test module that it should create an ApplicationContext. This is no different than using the existing Spring Test support. For additional information, refer to the Spring Reference2、@ContextConfiguration instructs the spring-test the configuration to use to create the ApplicationContext. Since no configuration is specified, the default configuration locations will be tried. This is no different than using the existing Spring Test support. For additional information, refer to the Spring ReferenceWithSecurityContextTestExecutionListener which will ensure our tests are ran with the correct user. It does this by populating the SecurityContextHolder prior to running our tests. After the test is done, it will clear out the SecurityContextHolder. If you only need Spring Security related support, you can replace @ContextConfiguration with @SecurityTestExecutionListeners.@PreAuthorize annotation to our HelloMessageService and so it requires an authenticated user to invoke it. If we ran the following test, we would expect the following test will pass:@Test(expected = AuthenticationCredentialsNotFoundException.class)
public void getMessageUnauthenticated() {
messageService.getMessage();
}
11.2 @WithMockUser
The question is "How could we most easily run the test as a specific user?" The answer is to use @WithMockUser. The following test will be run as a user with the username "user", the password "password", and the roles "ROLE_USER".
@Test
@WithMockUser
public void getMessageWithMockUser() {
String message = messageService.getMessage();
...
}
Specifically the following is true:
- The user with the username "user" does not have to exist since we are mocking the user
-
用户名为“user”的用户不必存在，因为我们正在模拟用户
- The
Authenticationthat is populated in theSecurityContextis of typeUsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken -
SecurityContext中填充的身份验证的类型为UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken
- The principal on the
Authenticationis Spring Security’sUserobject -
身份验证的主体是Spring Security的User对象
- The
Userwill have the username of "user", the password "password", and a singleGrantedAuthoritynamed "ROLE_USER" is used. -
用户将拥有“user”的用户名，密码“password”，并使用名为“ROLE_USER”的单个GrantedAuthority。
Our example is nice because we are able to leverage a lot of defaults. What if we wanted to run the test with a different username? The following test would run with the username "customUser". Again, the user does not need to actually exist.
@Test
@WithMockUser("customUsername")
public void getMessageWithMockUserCustomUsername() {
String message = messageService.getMessage();
...
}
We can also easily customize the roles. For example, this test will be invoked with the username "admin" and the roles "ROLE_USER" and "ROLE_ADMIN".
@Test
@WithMockUser(username="admin",roles={"USER","ADMIN"})
public void getMessageWithMockUserCustomUser() {
String message = messageService.getMessage();
...
}
If we do not want the value to automatically be prefixed with ROLE_ we can leverage the authorities attribute. For example, this test will be invoked with the username "admin" and the authorities "USER" and "ADMIN".
@Test
@WithMockUser(username = "admin", authorities = { "ADMIN", "USER" })
public void getMessageWithMockUserCustomAuthorities() {
String message = messageService.getMessage();
...
}
Of course it can be a bit tedious placing the annotation on every test method. Instead, we can place the annotation at the class level and every test will use the specified user. For example, the following would run every test with a user with the username "admin", the password "password", and the roles "ROLE_USER" and "ROLE_ADMIN".
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration
@WithMockUser(username="admin",roles={"USER","ADMIN"})
public class WithMockUserTests {
11.3 @WithAnonymousUser
Using @WithAnonymousUser allows running as an anonymous user. This is especially convenient when you wish to run most of your tests with a specific user, but want to run a few tests as an anonymous user. For example, the following will run withMockUser1 and withMockUser2 using @WithMockUser and anonymous as an anonymous user.
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@WithMockUser
public class WithUserClassLevelAuthenticationTests {
@Test
public void withMockUser1() {
}
@Test
public void withMockUser2() {
}
@Test
@WithAnonymousUser
public void anonymous() throws Exception {
// override default to run as anonymous user
}
}
11.4 @WithUserDetails
While @WithMockUser is a very convenient way to get started, it may not work in all instances. For example, it is common for applications to expect that the Authentication principal be of a specific type. This is done so that the application can refer to the principal as the custom type and reduce coupling on Spring Security.
UserDetailsService that returns an object that implements both UserDetails and the custom type. For situations like this, it is useful to create the test user using the custom UserDetailsService. That is exactly what @WithUserDetails does.UserDetailsService exposed as a bean, the following test will be invoked with an Authentication of type UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken and a principal that is returned from the UserDetailsService with the username of "user".@Test
@WithUserDetails
public void getMessageWithUserDetails() {
String message = messageService.getMessage();
...
}
We can also customize the username used to lookup the user from our UserDetailsService. For example, this test would be executed with a principal that is returned from the UserDetailsService with the username of "customUsername".
@Test
@WithUserDetails("customUsername")
public void getMessageWithUserDetailsCustomUsername() {
String message = messageService.getMessage();
...
}
We can also provide an explicit bean name to look up the UserDetailsService. For example, this test would look up the username of "customUsername" using the UserDetailsService with the bean name "myUserDetailsService".
@Test
@WithUserDetails(value="customUsername", userDetailsServiceBeanName="myUserDetailsService")
public void getMessageWithUserDetailsServiceBeanName() {
String message = messageService.getMessage();
...
}
Like @WithMockUser we can also place our annotation at the class level so that every test uses the same user. However unlike @WithMockUser, @WithUserDetailsrequires the user to exist.
11.5 @WithSecurityContext
We have seen that @WithMockUser is an excellent choice if we are not using a custom Authentication principal. Next we discovered that @WithUserDetails would allow us to use a custom UserDetailsService to create our Authentication principal but required the user to exist. We will now see an option that allows the most flexibility.
@WithSecurityContext to create any SecurityContext we want. For example, we might create an annotation named @WithMockCustomUser as shown below:@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@WithSecurityContext(factory = WithMockCustomUserSecurityContextFactory.class)
public @interface WithMockCustomUser {
String username() default "rob";
String name() default "Rob Winch";
}
You can see that @WithMockCustomUser is annotated with the @WithSecurityContext annotation. This is what signals to Spring Security Test support that we intend to create a SecurityContext for the test. The @WithSecurityContext annotation requires we specify a SecurityContextFactory that will create a new SecurityContext given our @WithMockCustomUser annotation. You can find our WithMockCustomUserSecurityContextFactory implementation below:
public class WithMockCustomUserSecurityContextFactory
implements WithSecurityContextFactory<WithMockCustomUser> {
@Override
public SecurityContext createSecurityContext(WithMockCustomUser customUser) {
SecurityContext context = SecurityContextHolder.createEmptyContext();
CustomUserDetails principal =
new CustomUserDetails(customUser.name(), customUser.username());
Authentication auth =
new UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken(principal, "password", principal.getAuthorities());
context.setAuthentication(auth);
return context;
}
}
We can now annotate a test class or a test method with our new annotation and Spring Security’s WithSecurityContextTestExecutionListener will ensure that our SecurityContext is populated appropriately.
WithSecurityContextFactory implementations, it is nice to know that they can be annotated with standard Spring annotations. For example, the WithUserDetailsSecurityContextFactory uses the @Autowired annotation to acquire the UserDetailsService:final class WithUserDetailsSecurityContextFactory
implements WithSecurityContextFactory<WithUserDetails> {
private UserDetailsService userDetailsService;
@Autowired
public WithUserDetailsSecurityContextFactory(UserDetailsService userDetailsService) {
this.userDetailsService = userDetailsService;
}
public SecurityContext createSecurityContext(WithUserDetails withUser) {
String username = withUser.value();
Assert.hasLength(username, "value() must be non-empty String");
UserDetails principal = userDetailsService.loadUserByUsername(username);
Authentication authentication = new UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken(principal, principal.getPassword(), principal.getAuthorities());
SecurityContext context = SecurityContextHolder.createEmptyContext();
context.setAuthentication(authentication);
return context;
}
}
11.6 Test Meta Annotations
If you reuse the same user within your tests often, it is not ideal to have to repeatedly specify the attributes. For example, if there are many tests related to an administrative user with the username "admin" and the roles ROLE_USER and ROLE_ADMIN you would have to write:
@WithMockUser(username="admin",roles={"USER","ADMIN"})
Rather than repeating this everywhere, we can use a meta annotation. For example, we could create a meta annotation named WithMockAdmin:
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@WithMockUser(value="rob",roles="ADMIN")
public @interface WithMockAdmin { }
Now we can use @WithMockAdmin in the same way as the more verbose @WithMockUser.
Meta annotations work with any of the testing annotations described above. For example, this means we could create a meta annotation for @WithUserDetails("admin") as well.