• Comparing the contribution of NBA draft picks(转)


    When it comes to the NBA draft, experts tend to argue about a number of things: at which position will a player be selected? what is the best draft class ever? etc… Luckily, the wealth of data made available by the great people ofhttp://www.basketball-reference.com/draft/ make it possible to address a number of these, and other questions.

    To begin, I started off by writing a quick Python script to scrape draft data for the time period of 1980-2014 (see at the end of this post for the source code, or on my GitHub). For the purpose of this analysis, I focussed on some key metrics that I deemed to be informative and useful enough to investigate further, which included:

    • Name of player (player)
    • College of drafted player (college)
    • Year of draft (draft_year)
    • Draft pick rank (rank)
    • Team that drafter the player (team)
    • Total games played (gp)
    • Total minutes played (mp)
    • Minutes per game (mpg)
    • Points per game (ppg)
    • Assists per game (apg)
    • Rebounds per game (rbg)
    • Win shares (ws)
    • Win shares per 48 minutes (ws_48)
    • Total years in league (yrs)

    Once this was achieved, I began by measuring the respective contribution of each pick position during the period of 1980-2014. Here, I simply computed and normalized the median statistics for each pick position. Not too surprisingly, higher draft picks tend to be contribute more to their respective teams, although we do notice that some late 2nd round draft pick have high win shares per 48 numbers. It turns out that these correspond to the picks at which Kurt Rambis (57th) and Manu Ginobilli (58th) were picked…but more on this later

    pick_performance
    Next, I decided to estimate the quality of each draft year by measuring how players performed in comparison to players picked at the same rank during other years. I was somewhat surprised to discover that the draft crop of 2008 was the one with the highest win shares, although looking back at the players that participated at that draft,it makes a lot of sense! On the other hand, the vaunted draft class of 1984 (Olajuwon, Barkley, Jordan) and 2003 (James, Anthony, Wade, Bosh) did not fare as well, which may be attributable to the fact that these included more elite players, but were far less deep in the lower picks of the draft.
    draft_year_performance
    Next, I looked at the longevity of each draft pick, in other words how long each draft pick is expected to remain in the NBA league, which can be achieved by using survival curves. Not too surprisingly, higher draft picks are much more likely to stay longer in the league. As a general observation, this also means that NBA teams are quite proficient at selecting the right players at the right position.

    pick_survival_curve

    At this point, we can examine the relative performance of NBA teams with regards to their drafting skills. To do this, I compared the performance of each player compared to the average performance of other players drafted at the same position, computed the respective ratios, and summed these up for each NBA team. This analysis revealed that the top 5 drafting teams were Detroit Pistons, Cleveland Cavaliers, Memphis Grizzlies, Phoenix Suns and the San Antonio Spurs (I purposely ignored the Brooklyn Nets and the New Orleans Hornets because of the small number of years these two teams have been in the league.)

    team_draft_ranking

    Finally, I decided to look for the best players picked at each position. Again, I compared each player’s career stats to the average numbers obtained by other players picked at the same position. For display purposes, I only show the top three players at each pick position, although you can easily reproduce the results by re-running my code here. (At this point, I should take the opportunity to advertise the great stargazerR package, which allows to quickly output R objects into LaTex or HTML tables). The results I obtained made a lot of sense, and I was very interested to learn that even at pick position 13, Kobe Bryant was only the 2nd best pick, as he was outnumbered by none other than the Mailman himself (i.e. Karl Malone). Of course, this analysis only considers numbers as opposed to achievements and trophies, but I think it is still amusing to find that Kobe Bryant isn’t even the most productive player at his position.

      Best pick 2nd best pick 3rd best pick
    1 LeBron James John Wall Allen Iverson
    2 Isiah Thomas Jason Kidd Gary Payton
    3 Michael Jordan Deron Williams Pau Gasol
    4 Chris Paul Russell Westbrook Stephon Marbury
    5 Charles Barkley Dwyane Wade Kevin Garnett
    6 Damian Lillard Brandon Roy Antoine Walker
    7 Kevin Johnson Stephen Curry Alvin Robertson
    8 Andre Miller Clark Kellogg Detlef Schrempf
    9 Dirk Nowitzki Tracy McGrady Andre Iguodala
    10 Paul Pierce Brandon Jennings Paul George
    11 Fat Lever Michael Carter-Williams Terrell Brandon
    12 Mookie Blaylock Muggsy Bogues John Bagley
    13 Karl Malone Kobe Bryant Sleepy Floyd
    14 Tim Hardaway Clyde Drexler Peja Stojakovic
    15 Steve Nash Al Jefferson Gary Grant
    16 John Stockton Nikola Vucevic Metta World Peace
    17 Jrue Holiday Josh Smith Shawn Kemp
    18 Mark Jackson Ty Lawson Joe Dumars
    19 Rod Strickland Zach Randolph Jeff Teague
    20 Larry Nance Jameer Nelson Paul Pressey
    21 Rajon Rondo Darren Collison Michael Finley
    22 Scott Skiles Reggie Lewis Kenneth Faried
    23 Tayshaun Prince A.C. Green Wilson Chandler
    24 Sam Cassell Kyle Lowry Arvydas Sabonis
    25 Jeff Ruland Mark Price Nicolas Batum
    26 Vlade Divac Kevin Martin George Hill
    27 Dennis Rodman Jamaal Tinsley Jordan Crawford
    28 Tony Parker Sherman Douglas Gene Banks
    29 Toni Kukoc Josh Howard P.J. Brown
    30 Gilbert Arenas Nate McMillan David Lee
    31 Doc Rivers Danny Ainge Nikola Pekovic
    32 Rashard Lewis Brent Price Luke Walton
    33 Grant Long Dirk Minniefield Steve Colter
    34 Carlos Boozer Mario Chalmers C.J. Miles
    35 Mike Iuzzolino DeAndre Jordan Derek Smith
    36 Clifford Robinson Ersan Ilyasova Omer Asik
    37 Nick Van Exel Mehmet Okur Jeff McInnis
    38 Chandler Parsons Chris Duhon Steve Blake
    39 Rafer Alston Earl Watson Khris Middleton
    40 Monta Ellis Dino Radja Lance Stephenson
    41 Cuttino Mobley Popeye Jones Otis Smith
    42 Stephen Jackson Patrick Beverley Matt Geiger
    43 Michael Redd Eric Snow Trevor Ariza
    44 Chase Budinger Malik Rose Cedric Henderson
    45 Goran Dragic Hot Rod Williams Antonio Davis
    46 Jeff Hornacek Jerome Kersey Voshon Lenard
    47 Paul Millsap Mo Williams Gerald Wilkins
    48 Marc Gasol Micheal Williams Cedric Ceballos
    49 Andray Blatche Haywoode Workman Kyle O’Quinn
    50 Ryan Gomes Paul Thompson Lavoy Allen
    51 Kyle Korver Jim Petersen Lawrence Funderburke
    52 Fred Hoiberg Anthony Goldwire Lowes Moore
    53 Anthony Mason Tod Murphy Greg Buckner
    54 Sam Mitchell Shandon Anderson Mark Blount
    55 Luis Scola Kenny Gattison Patrick Mills
    56 Ramon Sessions Amir Johnson Joe Kopicki
    57 Manu Ginobili Marcin Gortat Frank Brickowski
    58 Kurt Rambis Don Reid Robbie Hummel
    59 NA NA NA
    60 Isaiah Thomas Drazen Petrovic Robert Sacre

    As usual, all the code for this analysis can be found on GitHub account.

    CAVEATS

    With regards to the analysis shown above, it is important to highlight a few potential caveats:

      • I worked with career averages, which somewhat ignores the years of peak performance achieved by certain players. However, I feel it that career averages are a reasonably good proxy for overall player competence.
      • I completely ignored the fact that some teams had more opportunities to select higher draft picks than others (cough…Cleveland…cough). As such, there may be a bias towards historically bad teams that would have been in the top 5 picks more often than others. However, I did compare each player to others that were picked at the same position, some hopefully this will bypass the issue (for example, if a team had plenty of NO 1 picks that were bad compared to other NO 1 picks, this insight will be revealed in the analysis)

    转自:https://statofmind.wordpress.com/2015/01/26/comparing-the-contribution-of-nba-draft-picks/

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 数据和特征决定了效果上限,模型和算法决定了逼近这个上限的程度 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • 相关阅读:
    Java 垃圾回收机制
    Android 图片旋转(使用Matrix.setRotate方法)
    antd design vue 设置 v-decorator 的初始值
    校验 url 是否以http 或者https 开头
    有效的括号
    堆排序
    归并排序
    插入排序
    选择排序
    冒泡排序
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/payton/p/4251965.html
Copyright © 2020-2023  润新知