• Build Telemetry for Distributed Services之OpenTracing项目


    中文文档地址:https://wu-sheng.gitbooks.io/opentracing-io/content/pages/quick-start.html

    中文github地址:https://github.com/opentracing-contrib/opentracing-specification-zh

    参考资料:

    Metrics, tracing 和 logging 的关系

    探秘JVM内部结构

    The OpenTracing Semantic Specification

    Version: 1.1

    Document Overview

    This is the “formal” OpenTracing semantic specification. Since OpenTracing must work across many languages, this document takes care to avoid language-specific concepts. That said, there is an understanding throughout that all languages have some concept of an “interface” which encapsulates a set of related capabilities.

    Versioning policy

    The OpenTracing specification uses a Major.Minor version number but has no .Patch component. The major version increments when backwards-incompatible changes are made to the specification. The minor version increments for non-breaking changes like the introduction of new standard tags, log fields, or SpanContext reference types. (You can read more about the motivation for this versioning scheme at Issue specification#2)

    The OpenTracing Data Model

    Traces in OpenTracing are defined implicitly by their Spans. In particular, a Trace can be thought of as a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of Spans, where the edges between Spans are called References.

    For example, the following is an example Trace made up of 8 Spans:

    Causal relationships between Spans in a single Trace
    
    
            [Span A]  ←←←(the root span)
                |
         +------+------+
         |             |
     [Span B]      [Span C] ←←←(Span C is a `ChildOf` Span A)
         |             |
     [Span D]      +---+-------+
                   |           |
               [Span E]    [Span F] >>> [Span G] >>> [Span H]
                                           ↑
                                           ↑
                                           ↑
                             (Span G `FollowsFrom` Span F)
    
    

    Sometimes it’s easier to visualize Traces with a time axis as in the diagram below:

    Temporal relationships between Spans in a single Trace
    
    
    ––|–––––––|–––––––|–––––––|–––––––|–––––––|–––––––|–––––––|–> time
    
     [Span A···················································]
       [Span B··············································]
          [Span D··········································]
        [Span C········································]
             [Span E·······]        [Span F··] [Span G··] [Span H··]
    

    Each Span encapsulates the following state:

    • An operation name
    • A start timestamp
    • A finish timestamp
    • A set of zero or more key:value Span Tags. The keys must be strings. The values may be strings, bools, or numeric types.
    • A set of zero or more Span Logs, each of which is itself a key:value map paired with a timestamp. The keys must be strings, though the values may be of any type. Not all OpenTracing implementations must support every value type.
    • A SpanContext (see below)
    • References to zero or more causally-related Spans (via the SpanContext of those related Spans)

    Each SpanContext encapsulates the following state:

    • Any OpenTracing-implementation-dependent state (for example, trace and span ids) needed to refer to a distinct Span across a process boundary
    • Baggage Items, which are just key:value pairs that cross process boundaries

    References between Spans

    A Span may reference zero or more other SpanContexts that are causally related. OpenTracing presently defines two types of references: ChildOf and FollowsFrom. Both reference types specifically model direct causal relationships between a child Span and a parent Span. In the future, OpenTracing may also support reference types for Spans with non-causal relationships (e.g., Spans that are batched together, Spans that are stuck in the same queue, etc).

    ChildOf references: A Span may be the ChildOf a parent Span. In a ChildOf reference, the parent Span depends on the child Span in some capacity. All of the following would constitute ChildOf relationships:

    • A Span representing the server side of an RPC may be the ChildOf a Span representing the client side of that RPC
    • A Span representing a SQL insert may be the ChildOf a Span representing an ORM save method
    • Many Spans doing concurrent (perhaps distributed) work may all individually be the ChildOf a single parent Span that merges the results for all children that return within a deadline

    These could all be valid timing diagrams for children that are the ChildOf a parent.

        [-Parent Span---------]
             [-Child Span----]
    
        [-Parent Span--------------]
             [-Child Span A----]
              [-Child Span B----]
            [-Child Span C----]
             [-Child Span D---------------]
             [-Child Span E----]
    

    FollowsFrom references: Some parent Spans do not depend in any way on the result of their child Spans. In these cases, we say merely that the child Span FollowsFrom the parent Span in a causal sense. There are many distinct FollowsFrom reference sub-categories, and in future versions of OpenTracing they may be distinguished more formally.

    These can all be valid timing diagrams for children that “FollowFrom” a parent.

        [-Parent Span-]  [-Child Span-]
    
    
        [-Parent Span--]
         [-Child Span-]
    
    
        [-Parent Span-]
                    [-Child Span-]
    

    The OpenTracing API

    There are three critical and inter-related types in the OpenTracing specification: Tracer, Span, and SpanContext. Below, we go through the behaviors of each type; roughly speaking, each behavior becomes a “method” in a typical programming language, though it may actually be a set of related sibling methods due to type overloading and so on.

    When we discuss “optional” parameters, it is understood that different languages have different ways to construe such concepts. For example, in Go we might use the “functional Options” idiom, whereas in Java we might use a builder pattern.

    Tracer

    The Tracer interface creates Spans and understands how to Inject (serialize) and Extract (deserialize) them across process boundaries. Formally, it has the following capabilities:

    Start a new Span

    Required parameters

    • An operation name, a human-readable string which concisely represents the work done by the Span (for example, an RPC method name, a function name, or the name of a subtask or stage within a larger computation). The operation name should be the most general string that identifies a (statistically) interesting class of Span instances. That is, "get_user" is better than "get_user/314159".

    For example, here are potential operation names for a Span that gets hypothetical account information:

    Operation NameGuidance
    get Too general
    get_account/792 Too specific
    get_account Good, and account_id=792 would make a nice Span tag

    Optional parameters

    • Zero or more references to related SpanContexts, including a shorthand for ChildOf and FollowsFrom reference types if possible.
    • An optional explicit start timestamp; if omitted, the current walltime is used by default
    • Zero or more tags

    Returns a Span instance that’s already started (but not Finished)

    Inject a SpanContext into a carrier

    Required parameters

    • A SpanContext instance
    • A format descriptor (typically but not necessarily a string constant) which tells the Tracer implementation how to encode the SpanContext in the carrier parameter
    • A carrier, whose type is dictated by the format. The Tracer implementation will encode the SpanContext in this carrier object according to the format.

    Returns a SpanContext instance suitable for use as a reference when starting a new Span via the Tracer.

    Note: required formats for injection and extraction

    Both injection and extraction rely on an extensible format parameter that dictates the type of the associated “carrier” as well as how a SpanContext is encoded in that carrier. All of the following formats must be supported by all Tracer implementations.

    • Text Map: an arbitrary string-to-string map with an unrestricted character set for both keys and values
    • HTTP Headers: a string-to-string map with keys and values that are suitable for use in HTTP headers (a la RFC 7230). In practice, since there is such “diversity” in the way that HTTP headers are treated in the wild, it is strongly recommended that Tracer implementations use a limited HTTP header key space and escape values conservatively.
    • Binary: a (single) arbitrary binary blob representing a SpanContext

    Span

    With the exception of the method to retrieve the Span’s SpanContext, none of the below may be called after the Span is finished.

    Retrieve the Spans SpanContext

    There should be no parameters.

    Returns the SpanContext for the given Span. The returned value may be used even after the Span is finished.

    Overwrite the operation name

    Required parameters

    • The new operation name, which supersedes whatever was passed in when the Span was started

    Finish the Span

    Optional parameters

    • An explicit finish timestamp for the Span; if omitted, the current walltime is used implicitly.

    With the exception of the method to retrieve a Span’s SpanContext, no method may be called on a Span instance after it’s finished.

    Set a Span tag

    Required parameters

    • The tag key, which must be a string
    • The tag value, which must be either a string, a boolean value, or a numeric type

    Note that the OpenTracing project documents certain “standard tags” that have prescribed semantic meanings.

    Log structured data

    Required parameters

    • One or more key:value pairs, where the keys must be strings and the values may have any type at all. Some OpenTracing implementations may handle more (or more of) certain log values than others.

    Optional parameters

    • An explicit timestamp. If specified, it must fall between the local start and finish time for the span.

    Note that the OpenTracing project documents certain “standard log keys” which have prescribed semantic meanings.

    Set a baggage item

    Baggage items are key:value string pairs that apply to the given Span, its SpanContext, and all Spans which directly or transitively reference the local Span. That is, baggage items propagate in-band along with the trace itself.

    Baggage items enable powerful functionality given a full-stack OpenTracing integration (for example, arbitrary application data from a mobile app can make it, transparently, all the way into the depths of a storage system), and with it some powerful costs: use this feature with care.

    Use this feature thoughtfully and with care. Every key and value is copied into every local and remote child of the associated Span, and that can add up to a lot of network and cpu overhead.

    Required parameters

    • The baggage key, a string
    • The baggage value, a string

    Get a baggage item

    Required parameters

    • The baggage key, a string

    Returns either the corresponding baggage value, or some indication that such a value was missing.

    SpanContext

    The SpanContext is more of a “concept” than a useful piece of functionality at the generic OpenTracing layer. That said, it is of critical importance to OpenTracing implementations and does present a thin API of its own. Most OpenTracing users only interact with SpanContext via references when starting new Spans, or when injecting/extracting a trace to/from some transport protocol.

    In OpenTracing we force SpanContext instances to be immutable in order to avoid complicated lifetime issues around Span finish and references.

    Iterate through all baggage items

    This is modeled in different ways depending on the language, but semantically the caller should be able to efficiently iterate through all baggage items in one pass given a SpanContext instance.

    NoopTracer

    All OpenTracing language APIs must also provide some sort of NoopTracer implementation which can be used to flag-control OpenTracing or inject something harmless for tests (et cetera). In some cases (for example, Java) the NoopTracer may be in its own packaging artifact.

    Optional API Elements

    Some languages also provide utilities to pass an active Span and/or SpanContext around a single process. For instance, opentracing-go provides helpers to set and get the active Span in Go’s context.Context mechanism.

    OpenTracing Project Organization

    OpenTracing is a set of standard APIs that consistently model and describe the behavior of distributed systems. There are three constituencies that care about this standard:

    1. Tracing tool maintainers: “Instrumenting all software” is an unreasonable goal for any one particular tracing or monitoring project or vendor. OpenTracing essentially amortizes this work.
    2. Software developers who build and deploy applications: These developers want to use whatever tracing and observability tools that work best within their organization’s infrastructure, and they want to choose those tools independent of whatever third-party (open-source) software packages they happen to have built around.
    3. Software developers who contribute to widely-used software: Inasmuch as this software needs to exist within a microservices deployment, it must integrate with whatever tracing tool(s) its diverse users already depend on.

    OpenTracing’s project organization makes room for each of these constituencies.

    Contributed OpenTracing Support

    Repositories under github.com/opentracing-contrib pertain to specific open-source software packages and projects. Each may have its own owners and internal policies regarding PRs, review requirements, and committer management. You can learn more about OpenTracing contributions via the opentracing-contrib meta-repository.

    Semantic Conventions

    The OpenTracing Specification describes the overarching language-neutral data model and API guidelines for OpenTracing. That data model includes the related concepts of Span Tags and (structured) Log Fields; though these terms are defined in the specification, there is no guidance there about standard Span tags or logging keys.

    Those semantic conventions are described by this document. The document is divided into two sections: first, tables listing all standard Span tags and logging keys; then guidance about how to combine these to model certain important semantic concepts.

    Versioning

    Changes to this file affect the OpenTracing specification version. Additions should bump the minor version, and backwards-incompatible changes (or perhaps very large additions) should bump the major version.

    Standard Span tags and log fields

    Span tags table

    Span tags apply to the entire Span; as such, they apply to the entire timerange of the Span, not a particular moment with a particular timestamp: those sorts of events are best modelled as Span log fields (per the table in the next subsection of this document).

    Span tag nameTypeNotes and examples
    component string The software package, framework, library, or module that generated the associated Span. E.g., "grpc", "django", "JDBI".
    db.instance string Database instance name. E.g., In java, if the jdbc.url="jdbc:mysql://127.0.0.1:3306/customers", the instance name is "customers".
    db.statement string A database statement for the given database type. E.g., for db.type="sql", "SELECT * FROM wuser_table"; for db.type="redis", "SET mykey 'WuValue'".
    db.type string Database type. For any SQL database, "sql". For others, the lower-case database category, e.g. "cassandra", "hbase", or "redis".
    db.user string Username for accessing database. E.g., "readonly_user" or "reporting_user"
    error bool true if and only if the application considers the operation represented by the Span to have failed
    http.method string HTTP method of the request for the associated Span. E.g., "GET", "POST"
    http.status_code integer HTTP response status code for the associated Span. E.g., 200, 503, 404
    http.url string URL of the request being handled in this segment of the trace, in standard URI format. E.g., "https://domain.net/path/to?resource=here"
    message_bus.destination string An address at which messages can be exchanged. E.g. A Kafka record has an associated "topic name" that can be extracted by the instrumented producer or consumer and stored using this tag.
    peer.address string Remote “address”, suitable for use in a networking client library. This may be a "ip:port", a bare "hostname", a FQDN, or even a JDBC substring like "mysql://prod-db:3306"
    peer.hostname string Remote hostname. E.g., "opentracing.io", "internal.dns.name"
    peer.ipv4 string Remote IPv4 address as a .-separated tuple. E.g., "127.0.0.1"
    peer.ipv6 string Remote IPv6 address as a string of colon-separated 4-char hex tuples. E.g., "2001:0db8:85a3:0000:0000:8a2e:0370:7334"
    peer.port integer Remote port. E.g., 80
    peer.service string Remote service name (for some unspecified definition of "service"). E.g., "elasticsearch", "a_custom_microservice", "memcache"
    sampling.priority integer If greater than 0, a hint to the Tracer to do its best to capture the trace. If 0, a hint to the trace to not-capture the trace. If absent, the Tracer should use its default sampling mechanism.
    span.kind string Either "client" or "server" for the appropriate roles in an RPC, and "producer" or "consumer" for the appropriate roles in a messaging scenario.

    Log fields table

    Every Span log has a specific timestamp (which must fall between the start and finish timestamps of the Span, inclusive) and one or more fields. What follows are the standard fields.

    Span log field nameTypeNotes and examples
    error.kind string The type or “kind” of an error (only for event="error" logs). E.g., "Exception", "OSError"
    error.object object For languages that support such a thing (e.g., Java, Python), the actual Throwable/Exception/Error object instance itself. E.g., A java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException instance, a python exceptions.NameError instance
    event string A stable identifier for some notable moment in the lifetime of a Span. For instance, a mutex lock acquisition or release or the sorts of lifetime events in a browser page load described in the Performance.timing specification. E.g., from Zipkin, "cs", "sr", "ss", or "cr". Or, more generally, "initialized" or "timed out". For errors, "error"
    message string A concise, human-readable, one-line message explaining the event. E.g., "Could not connect to backend", "Cache invalidation succeeded"
    stack string A stack trace in platform-conventional format; may or may not pertain to an error. E.g., "File "example.py", line 7, in <module> caller() File "example.py", line 5, in caller callee() File "example.py", line 2, in callee raise Exception("Yikes") "

     

    Modelling special circumstances

    RPCs

    The following Span tags combine to model RPCs:

    • span.kind: either "client" or "server". It is important to provide this tag at Span start time, as it may affect internal ID generation.
    • peer.address, peer.hostname, peer.ipv4, peer.ipv6, peer.port, peer.service: optional tags that describe the RPC peer (often in ways it cannot assess internally)

    Message Bus

    A message bus is asynchronous, and therefore the relationship type used to link a Consumer Span and a Producer Span would be Follows From (see References between Spans for more information on relationship types).

    The following Span tags combine to model message bus based communications:

    • message_bus.destination: as described in the table above
    • span.kind: either "producer" or "consumer". It is important to provide this tag at Span start time, as it may affect internal ID generation.
    • peer.address, peer.hostname, peer.ipv4, peer.ipv6, peer.port, peer.service: optional tags that describe the message bus broker (often in ways it cannot assess internally)

    Database (client) calls

    The following Span tags combine to model database calls:

    • db.type, db.instance, db.user, and db.statement: as described in the table above
    • peer.address, peer.hostname, peer.ipv4, peer.ipv6, peer.port, peer.service: optional tags that describe the database peer
    • span.kind: "client"

    Captured errors

    Errors may be described by OpenTracing in different ways, largely depending on the language. Some of these descriptive fields are specific to errors; others are not (e.g., the event or message fields).

    For languages where an error object encapsulates a stack trace and type information, log the following fields:

    • event="error"
    • error.object=<error object instance>

    For other languages, or when above is not feasible:

    • event="error"
    • message="..."
    • stack="..." (optional)
    • error.kind="..." (optional)

    This scheme allows Tracer implementations to extract what information they need from the actual error object when it’s available.

  • 相关阅读:
    USACO 4.1 Fence Rails
    POJ 1742
    LA 2031
    uva 10564
    poj 3686
    LA 3350
    asp.net MVC 3多语言方案--再次写, 配源码
    使用Log4net记录日志
    在C#用HttpWebRequest中发送GET/HTTP/HTTPS请求
    为什么要使用反射机制
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/panpanwelcome/p/11712601.html
Copyright © 2020-2023  润新知