red hat 官方给出的team和bond特性对比
A Comparison of Features in Bonding and Team
Feature | Bonding | Team |
---|---|---|
broadcast Tx policy | Yes | Yes |
round-robin Tx policy | Yes | Yes |
active-backup Tx policy | Yes | Yes |
LACP (802.3ad) support | Yes (active only) | Yes |
Hash-based Tx policy | Yes | Yes |
User can set hash function | No | Yes |
Tx load-balancing support (TLB) | Yes | Yes |
LACP hash port select | Yes | Yes |
load-balancing for LACP support | No | Yes |
Ethtool link monitoring | Yes | Yes |
ARP link monitoring | Yes | Yes |
NS/NA (IPv6) link monitoring | No | Yes |
ports up/down delays | Yes | Yes |
port priorities and stickiness (“primary”option enhancement) | No | Yes |
separate per-port link monitoring setup | No | Yes |
multiple link monitoring setup | Limited | Yes |
lockless Tx/Rx path | No (rwlock) | Yes (RCU) |
VLAN support | Yes | Yes |
user-space runtime control | Limited | Full |
Logic in user-space | No | Yes |
Extensibility | Hard | Easy |
Modular design | No | Yes |
Performance overhead | Low | Very Low |
D-Bus interface | No | Yes |
multiple device stacking | Yes | Yes |
zero config using LLDP | No | (in planning) |
NetworkManager support | Yes | Yes |