• Java高并发专题之32、原子操作增强类LongAdder、LongAccumulator


    本文主要内容

    1. 4种方式实现计数器功能,对比其性能
    2. 介绍LongAdder
    3. 介绍LongAccumulator

    来个需求

    一个jvm中实现一个计数器功能,需保证多线程情况下数据正确性。

    我们来模拟50个线程,每个线程对计数器递增100万次,最终结果应该是5000万。

    我们使用4种方式实现,看一下其性能,然后引出为什么需要使用LongAdderLongAccumulator

    方式一:synchronized方式实现

    package com.itsoku.chat32;
    
    import java.util.ArrayList;
    import java.util.List;
    import java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture;
    import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
    import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
    import java.util.concurrent.atomic.LongAccumulator;
    
    /**
     * 跟着阿里p7学并发,微信公众号:javacode2018
     */
    public class Demo1 {
        static int count = 0;
    
        public static synchronized void incr() {
            count++;
        }
    
        public static void main(String[] args) throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
                count = 0;
                m1();
            }
        }
    
        private static void m1() throws InterruptedException {
            long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            int threadCount = 50;
            CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(threadCount);
            for (int i = 0; i < threadCount; i++) {
                new Thread(() -> {
                    try {
                        for (int j = 0; j < 1000000; j++) {
                            incr();
                        }
                    } finally {
                        countDownLatch.countDown();
                    }
                }).start();
            }
            countDownLatch.await();
            long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            System.out.println(String.format("结果:%s,耗时(ms):%s", count, (t2 - t1)));
        }
    }
    

    输出:

    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):1437
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):1913
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):386
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):383
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):381
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):382
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):379
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):379
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):392
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):384
    

    平均耗时:390毫秒

    方式2:AtomicLong实现

    package com.itsoku.chat32;
    
    import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
    import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
    import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong;
    
    /**
     * 跟着阿里p7学并发,微信公众号:javacode2018
     */
    public class Demo2 {
        static AtomicLong count = new AtomicLong(0);
    
        public static void incr() {
            count.incrementAndGet();
        }
    
        public static void main(String[] args) throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
                count.set(0);
                m1();
            }
        }
    
        private static void m1() throws InterruptedException {
            long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            int threadCount = 50;
            CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(threadCount);
            for (int i = 0; i < threadCount; i++) {
                new Thread(() -> {
                    try {
                        for (int j = 0; j < 1000000; j++) {
                            incr();
                        }
                    } finally {
                        countDownLatch.countDown();
                    }
                }).start();
            }
            countDownLatch.await();
            long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            System.out.println(String.format("结果:%s,耗时(ms):%s", count, (t2 - t1)));
        }
    }
    

    输出:

    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):971
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):915
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):920
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):923
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):910
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):916
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):923
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):916
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):912
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):908
    

    平均耗时:920毫秒

    AtomicLong内部采用CAS的方式实现,并发量大的情况下,CAS失败率比较高,导致性能比synchronized还低一些。并发量不是太大的情况下,CAS性能还是可以的。

    AtomicLong属于JUC中的原子类,还不是很熟悉的可以看一下:JUC中原子类,一篇就够了

    方式3:LongAdder实现

    先介绍一下LongAdder,说到LongAdder,不得不提的就是AtomicLong,AtomicLong是JDK1.5开始出现的,里面主要使用了一个long类型的value作为成员变量,然后使用循环的CAS操作去操作value的值,并发量比较大的情况下,CAS操作失败的概率较高,内部失败了会重试,导致耗时可能会增加。

    LongAdder是JDK1.8开始出现的,所提供的API基本上可以替换掉原先的AtomicLong。LongAdder在并发量比较大的情况下,操作数据的时候,相当于把这个数字分成了很多份数字,然后交给多个人去管控,每个管控者负责保证部分数字在多线程情况下操作的正确性。当多线程访问的时,通过hash算法映射到具体管控者去操作数据,最后再汇总所有的管控者的数据,得到最终结果。相当于降低了并发情况下锁的粒度,所以效率比较高,看一下下面的图,方便理解:

    代码:

    package com.itsoku.chat32;
    
    import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
    import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
    import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong;
    import java.util.concurrent.atomic.LongAdder;
    
    /**
     * 跟着阿里p7学并发,微信公众号:javacode2018
     */
    public class Demo3 {
        static LongAdder count = new LongAdder();
    
        public static void incr() {
            count.increment();
        }
    
        public static void main(String[] args) throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
                count.reset();
                m1();
            }
        }
    
        private static void m1() throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
            long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            int threadCount = 50;
            CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(threadCount);
            for (int i = 0; i < threadCount; i++) {
                new Thread(() -> {
                    try {
                        for (int j = 0; j < 1000000; j++) {
                            incr();
                        }
                    } finally {
                        countDownLatch.countDown();
                    }
                }).start();
            }
            countDownLatch.await();
            long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            System.out.println(String.format("结果:%s,耗时(ms):%s", count.sum(), (t2 - t1)));
        }
    }
    

    输出:

    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):206
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):105
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):107
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):107
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):105
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):99
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):106
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):102
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):106
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):102
    

    平均耗时:100毫秒

    代码中new LongAdder()创建一个LongAdder对象,内部数字初始值是0,调用increment()方法可以对LongAdder内部的值原子递增1。reset()方法可以重置LongAdder的值,使其归0。

    方式4:LongAccumulator实现

    LongAccumulator介绍

    LongAccumulator是LongAdder的功能增强版。LongAdder的API只有对数值的加减,而LongAccumulator提供了自定义的函数操作,其构造函数如下:

    /**
      * accumulatorFunction:需要执行的二元函数(接收2个long作为形参,并返回1个long)
      * identity:初始值
     **/
    public LongAccumulator(LongBinaryOperator accumulatorFunction, long identity) {
        this.function = accumulatorFunction;
        base = this.identity = identity;
    }
    

    示例代码:

    package com.itsoku.chat32;
    
    import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
    import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
    import java.util.concurrent.atomic.LongAccumulator;
    import java.util.concurrent.atomic.LongAdder;
    
    /**
     * 跟着阿里p7学并发,微信公众号:javacode2018
     */
    public class Demo4 {
        static LongAccumulator count = new LongAccumulator((x, y) -> x + y, 0L);
    
        public static void incr() {
            count.accumulate(1);
        }
    
        public static void main(String[] args) throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
                count.reset();
                m1();
            }
        }
    
        private static void m1() throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
            long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            int threadCount = 50;
            CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(threadCount);
            for (int i = 0; i < threadCount; i++) {
                new Thread(() -> {
                    try {
                        for (int j = 0; j < 1000000; j++) {
                            incr();
                        }
                    } finally {
                        countDownLatch.countDown();
                    }
                }).start();
            }
            countDownLatch.await();
            long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            System.out.println(String.format("结果:%s,耗时(ms):%s", count.longValue(), (t2 - t1)));
        }
    }
    

    输出:

    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):138
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):111
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):111
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):103
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):103
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):105
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):101
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):106
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):102
    结果:50000000,耗时(ms):103
    

    平均耗时:100毫秒

    LongAccumulator的效率和LongAdder差不多,不过更灵活一些。

    调用new LongAdder()等价于new LongAccumulator((x, y) -> x + y, 0L)

    从上面4个示例的结果来看,LongAdder、LongAccumulator全面超越同步锁及AtomicLong的方式,建议在使用AtomicLong的地方可以直接替换为LongAdder、LongAccumulator,吞吐量更高一些。

    来源:http://itsoku.com/course/1/32
  • 相关阅读:
    浏览器为何禁止跨域(同源策略)
    viewPager
    How to remove focus without setting focus to another control?
    android ANR
    解决Ubuntu系统中文乱码显示问题
    USB 3.0规范中译本 第6章 物理层
    库&框架-----CDN网络引用总结
    18_如何排错
    17_今日回顾
    16_sql注入的原理及处理
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/konglxblog/p/16222983.html
Copyright © 2020-2023  润新知