• 关于Optimizer_index_cost_adj参数的设置


    关于Optimizer_index_cost_adj参数的设置

    Thomas建议:
    对于许多系统,应到考虑设置这两个参数为非默认值,至少测试一下两种极端情形:

    1. optimizer_index_caching=0 和 optimizer_index_cost_adj=100的默认值. 他们一般适用于许多数据仓库/报表系统

    2. otpimizer_index_caching=90和optimizer_index_cost_adj=25的设置,他们一般适用于许多事物处理系统/oltp系统.

    对于数据仓库和DSS系统要反复调整来取一个合理值。
    Oracle在选择不同的访问路径时,会对全表扫描和索引扫描进行比较评估,在比较的时候,
    Oracle会把索引扫描的成本转换为全表扫描的成本,和全表扫描的COST进行比较。这个转换需要一个转换因子,就是Optimizer_index_cost_adj;
    Optimizer_index_cost_adj*(index scan cost)=等价的Full Scan cost

    所以 optimizer_index_cost_adj = Full Scan Cost / Index Scan Cost

    在缺省情况下:Optimizer_index_cost_adj=100

    SQL> show parameter optimizer_index_cost_adj
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
    optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
    SQL> create table t3 as select * from dba_objects;
    Table created

    SQL>
    SQL> create index ind_owner on t3(owner);
    Index created
    SQL> analyze table t3 compute statistics;

    SQL> set autotrace on
    SQL> set timing on
    SQL> set autotrace traceonly

    SQL> alter session set optimizer_index_cost_adj=43;

    Session altered.

    select  /*+ FULL(t3)*/* from bia_stg.t3 t3 where owner='BIA_STG';

    322 rows selected.

    Execution Plan
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Plan hash value: 2574254479

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Id  | Operation         | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |      |  3044 |   255K|   130   (2)| 00:00:02 |
    |*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T3   |  3044 |   255K|   130   (2)| 00:00:02 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    ---------------------------------------------------

       1 - filter("OWNER"='BIA_STG')

    Statistics
    ----------------------------------------------------------
              0  recursive calls
              0  db block gets
            739  consistent gets
              0  physical reads
              0  redo size
          23185  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
            700  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
             23  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              0  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
            322  rows processed

    SQL> select /*+ index(t3 ind_owner)*/* from bia_stg.t3 t3 where owner='BIA_STG';

    322 rows selected.

    Execution Plan
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Plan hash value: 2790462862

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---------

    | Id  | Operation                   | Name      | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| T
    ime     |

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---------

    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |           |  3044 |   255K|    89   (0)| 0
    0:00:02 |

    |   1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T3        |  3044 |   255K|    89   (0)| 0
    0:00:02 |

    |*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_OWNER |  3044 |       |     8   (0)| 0
    0:00:01 |

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---------

    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    ---------------------------------------------------

       2 - access("OWNER"='BIA_STG')

    Statistics
    ----------------------------------------------------------
              0  recursive calls
              0  db block gets
             65  consistent gets
              0  physical reads
              0  redo size
          23185  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
            700  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
             23  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              0  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
            322  rows processed

    optimizer_index_cost_adj = Full Scan Cost / Index Scan Cost* 100=130/89 * 100=1.460 * 100

    =146

    optimizer_index_cost_adj调整为147

  • 相关阅读:
    Kubernetes弹性伸缩全场景解读(五)
    阿里靠什么支撑 EB 级计算力?
    云原生生态周报 Vol. 2
    国内唯一,阿里云入选全球区块链云服务报告,领先AWS、Google
    GitOps:Kubernetes多集群环境下的高效CICD实践
    阿里开发者招聘节 | 面试题01:如何实现一个高效的单向链表逆序输出?
    noip2012 开车旅行
    noip2012 借教室
    noip2012 同余方程
    noip2012 国王游戏
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/jimeper/p/1398922.html
Copyright © 2020-2023  润新知