It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Give your reasons.
Every organization consists of a leader and some members. Each of them plays an important yet different role in the group. As an individual, I find it more beneficial to be a leader than a member of the group. The reasons are quite obvious.
Being a leader is more conducive to personal growth. The rolw of a leader involves much responsibility and decision-making. This means you must engage yourself in a wide range of activities and learning. In doing so, your ability to tackle difficult problems and handle complex situations can be developed. Take myself for example. Before I was promoted to Branch Manager three years ago, I was only an ordinary teacher with little responsibilities or accomplishment. But the experience of being a manager has turned me into a capable and efficient leader.
Moreover, as a leader, one can establish more rewarding connections with influential people. Managers and department heads, for the nature of their work, tend to have more interactions with their peers or superiors, who are themselves leaders. These connections with influential people can lead to more career opportunities and pave the way for their future career. Besides, by consorting with people with superior minds or experiences, one often gets inspired and acquires different perspectives of and insights into things. By contrast, a member of a group often lacks these kinds of opportunities.
Without losing sight of the importance of teamwork and the contribution made by each member of a group, we should give due credits to the leader of the group. He is the one that holds the group together and in turn he reaps the benefits of his position in terms of personal growth and career development.
Reference:
剑桥雅思写作高分范文
在京东购买：剑桥雅思写作高分范文
在亚马逊购买：剑桥雅思写作真题范文百篇