• Oracle11gR2 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN 成本计算


     SQL> select * from v$version where rownum<2;

    BANNER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production

    create index i_test_owner on test(owner);

    SQL> create index i_test_owner on test(owner);

    Index created.

    INDEX FAST FULL SCAN只需要扫描叶子块,并且采用多块读,所以查询LEAF_BLOCKS

    SQL>  select leaf_blocks from user_indexes where index_name='I_TEST_OWNER';

    LEAF_BLOCKS
    -----------
             22

    SQL> explain plan for select count(owner) from test;

    Explained.

    SQL> select cpu_cost from plan_table;

      CPU_COST
    ----------
       1356672
      
    SQL>  select pname, pval1 from sys.aux_stats$ where sname='SYSSTATS_MAIN';

    PNAME                               PVAL1
    ------------------------------ ----------
    CPUSPEED                             2500
    CPUSPEEDNW                     2696.05568
    IOSEEKTIM                              10
    IOTFRSPEED                           4096
    MAXTHR
    MBRC                                   12
    MREADTIM                               30
    SLAVETHR
    SREADTIM                                5

    9 rows selected.

    因为MBRC不为空,所以CBO会采用工作量模式计算Cost
      
    INDEX FAST FULL SCAN 成本计算公式如下:

    Cost = (
           #SRds * sreadtim +
           #MRds * mreadtim +
           CPUCycles / cpuspeed /1000
           ) / sreadtime
          
    #SRds - number of single block reads
    #MRds - number of multi block reads
    #CPUCyles - number of CPU cycles

    sreadtim - single block read time
    mreadtim - multi block read time
    cpuspeed - CPU cycles per second

    Cost = (
           #SRds * sreadtim +                            ---SRds=0
           #MRds * mreadtim +                          ---MRds=Leaf_Blocks/MBCR=22/12, mreadtim=30
           CPUCycles / cpuspeed / 1000         ---CPUCycles=PLAN_TABLE.CPU_COST,cpuspeed=2500
           ) / sreadtime

    所以人工计算的成本等于:
    SQL> select ceil(22/12*30/5)+ceil(1356672/2500/5/1000)+1 from dual; ---+1是因为 _table_scan_cost_plus_one设置为true

    CEIL(22/12*30/5)+CEIL(1356672/2500/5/1000)+1
    --------------------------------------------
                                              13
                                                                                       
    SQL> select count(owner) from test;

    Execution Plan
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Plan hash value: 1992658997

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Id  | Operation             | Name         | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |              |     1 |     5 |    13   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |              |     1 |     5 |            |          |
    |   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| I_TEST_OWNER | 10000 | 50000 |    13   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    现在采用非工作量统计来计算Cost

    SQL> begin
       dbms_stats.set_system_stats('CPUSPEED',0);
       dbms_stats.set_system_stats('SREADTIM',0);
       dbms_stats.set_system_stats('MREADTIM',0);
       dbms_stats.set_system_stats('MBRC',0);
    end;
    /
      2    3    4    5    6    7

    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

    SQL> show parameter db_file_multiblock_read_count

    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
    db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     16

    SQL> select (select pval1 from sys.aux_stats$ where pname = 'IOSEEKTIM') +
           (select value
              from v$parameter
             where name = 'db_file_multiblock_read_count') *
      2    3    4    5         (select value from v$parameter where name = 'db_block_size') /
      6         (select pval1 from sys.aux_stats$ where pname = 'IOTFRSPEED') "mreadtim"
      7    from dual;

      mreadtim
    ----------
            42
    SQL> select (select pval1 from sys.aux_stats$ where pname = 'IOSEEKTIM') +
           (select value from v$parameter where name = 'db_block_size') /
           (select pval1 from sys.aux_stats$ where pname = 'IOTFRSPEED') "sreadtim"
      from dual;  2    3    4

      sreadtim
    ----------
            12
           
    SQL> select cpu_cost from plan_table;

      CPU_COST
    ----------
       1356672

    根据成本计算公式

    Cost = (
           #SRds * sreadtim +                            ---SRds=0
           #MRds * mreadtim +                          ---MRds=Leaf_Blocks/db_file_multiblock_read_count=22/16, mreadtim=42
           CPUCycles / cpuspeed / 1000         ---CPUCycles=PLAN_TABLE.CPU_COST,cpuspeed=2696.05568
           ) / sreadtime
          
    那么手工计算的Cost等于:

    SQL> select ceil(22/16*42/12)+ceil(1356672/2696.05568/12/1000)+1 from dual;

    CEIL(22/16*42/12)+CEIL(1356672/2696.05568/12/1000)+1
    ----------------------------------------------------
                                                       7
    SQL> set autot trace
    SQL> select count(owner) from test;

    Execution Plan
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Plan hash value: 1992658997

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Id  | Operation             | Name         | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |              |     1 |     5 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |              |     1 |     5 |            |          |
    |   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| I_TEST_OWNER | 10000 | 50000 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    从实验中可以看到,INDEX FAST FULL SCAN 在11gR2中的成本算法依然和9i,10g一样,没有变化。

  • 相关阅读:
    最简单的基于FFMPEG+SDL的音频播放器 ver2 (採用SDL2.0)
    JBPM——工作流概念
    android项目中的拍照和本地图片截图
    hunnu--11547--你的组合数学学得怎样?
    POJ 2253
    [ACM] POJ 3349 Snowflake Snow Snowflakes(哈希查找,链式解决冲突)
    Redis简述
    C/C++,从未过时的编程语言之父
    Android4.4 Framework分析——getContentResolver启动ContentProvider的过程
    2012_p2 寻宝 (treasure.cpp/c/pas)
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/hehe520/p/6330575.html
Copyright © 2020-2023  润新知