【Kaggle】Plant Seedings Classification

Problem:

- Kaggle 上的比赛，识别12种类型的植物，a dataset containing images of approximately 960 unique plants belonging to 12 species at several growth stages.

- Dataset:

　　train/, test/ 分别包含训练集图片和测试集图片，train.csv和test.csv包含了图片名和其对应的种类标签。

流程：

1. Get Data

2. 预处理Cleaning Data

2.1 Masking green plant

假设所有植物都是绿色的，那么可以创建一个mask来除去除了绿色部分以外的图像（认为是背景）。

使用HSV，比起RGB更容易表示color range.

* HSV: Hue, Saturation, Value：色调（H），饱和度（S），明度（V）.

* 为了除去noise，先blur image（模糊处理）。基本思路就是：在原始图像基础上创建HSV图像，创建一个基于绿色range的mask，将它转换成boolean mask，然后应用在原始图像上。

　　1. Gaussian blur除噪

　　2. RGB转换成HSV：cv2.cvtColor(rgb_image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2HSV)

　　3. 建立mask：

mask = cv2.inRange(hsv, lower_green, upper_green)
kernel = cv2.getStructuringElement(cv2.MORPH_ELLIPSE, (11,11))
mask = cv2.morphologyEx(mask, cv2.MORPH_CLOSE, kernel)

cv2.inRange:

- 第一个参数：hsv指的是原图
- 第二个参数：lower_red指的是图像中低于这个lower_red的值，图像值变为0
- 第三个参数：upper_red指的是图像中高于这个upper_red的值，图像值变为0
- 而在lower_red～upper_red之间的值变成255

　　　　cv2.getStructuringElement(): 定义结构元素（参考5,6）

　　　　cv2.morphologyEx(): 闭运算（参考7），先膨胀后腐蚀，一般用来填充黑色的小像素点。

　　　　　　（参考8）

　　4. 应用boolean mask，得到无背景图像：　　　　

bMask = mask>0

2.2 Normalize Input 归一化

clearTrainImg = clearTrainImg / 255

2.3 Categories Labels 类别标签

将12个类别标签进行one-hot编码

　　1. 将字符类的标签（不连续的标签）进行编号：sklearn.preprocessing.LabelEncoder.transform(strlabel)

　　　　* 与文本处理不同，这里的编号和频次无关。

　　2. 对类别编号进行独热向量编码：keras.utils.np_utils.to_categorical(encodedStrLabel)

3. 建模 Model

3.1 数据分割

- train set中留出10%作为验证集。

- 由于数据不均衡，进行分层采样：stratify = trainlabel

sklearn.model_selection.train_test_split(traindata, trainlabel, /    
                        　　　　　　　　　　test_size = 0.1, random_state = see, /        
                        　　　　　　　　　　stratify = trainlabel)

3.2 Data generator

为防止过拟合，创建一个image generator，随机旋转、缩放、平移、翻转图像。

3.3 Create Model

方案一：keras序贯模型

　　6 CONV layers, 3 FC layers.
- 前两个卷积层包含64个卷积核，第三四个128个卷积核，第五六个256个卷积核。
- 每两个卷积层后接一个max池化层。
- 每两个卷积层后使用一个dropout layer（10% btw CONV Layers, 50% btw FC layers）
- 在每一层之间，使用batch normalization layer。

方案二：keras Xception模型

base_model = Xception(weights='imagenet', input_shape=(img_size, img_size, 3), include_top=False)
x = base_model.output
x = GlobalAveragePooling2D()(x)
x = Dropout(0.5)(x)
x = Dense(1024, activation='relu')(x)
x = Dropout(0.5)(x)
predictions = Dense(12, activation='softmax')(x)
model = Model(inputs=base_model.input, outputs=predictions)
 
model.compile(optimizer='Adadelta',
              loss='categorical_crossentropy',
              metrics=['accuracy'])
 
model.fit_generator(datagen.flow(train_img, train_label, batch_size=batch_size), steps_per_epoch=len(train_img)//batch_size, epochs=100, verbose=1)
model.save_weights('Xception.h5')

3.4 Fit Model

方案一：CNN

 1 from keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpoint, ReduceLROnPlateau, CSVLogger
 2 
 3 # learning rate reduction
 4 learning_rate_reduction = ReduceLROnPlateau(monitor='val_acc', 
 5                                             patience=3, 
 6                                             verbose=1, 
 7                                             factor=0.4, 
 8                                             min_lr=0.00001)
 9 
10 # checkpoints
11 filepath="./drive/DataScience/PlantReco/weights.best_{epoch:02d}-{val_acc:.2f}.hdf5"
12 checkpoint = ModelCheckpoint(filepath, monitor='val_acc', 
13                              verbose=1, save_best_only=True, mode='max')
14 filepath="./drive/DataScience/PlantReco/weights.last_auto4.hdf5"
15 checkpoint_all = ModelCheckpoint(filepath, monitor='val_acc', 
16                                  verbose=1, save_best_only=False, mode='max')
17 
18 # all callbacks
19 callbacks_list = [checkpoint, learning_rate_reduction, checkpoint_all]

1 # fit model
2 hist = model.fit_generator(datagen.flow(trainX, trainY, batch_size=75), 
3                            epochs=35, validation_data=(testX, testY), 
4                            steps_per_epoch=trainX.shape[0], callbacks=callbacks_list)

Total params: 3,320,396
Trainable params: 3,317,580
Non-trainable params: 2,816
_________________________________________________________________
Epoch 1/35
57/57 [==============================] - 139s 2s/step - loss: 2.6670 - acc: 0.2442 - val_loss: 6.4567 - val_acc: 0.2400

Epoch 00001: val_acc improved from -inf to 0.24000, saving model to ./model/weights.best_01-0.24.hdf5

Epoch 00001: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 2/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 1.8978 - acc: 0.4061 - val_loss: 1.7727 - val_acc: 0.5053

Epoch 00002: val_acc improved from 0.24000 to 0.50526, saving model to ./model/weights.best_02-0.51.hdf5

Epoch 00002: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 3/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 1.5648 - acc: 0.4727 - val_loss: 1.4101 - val_acc: 0.5916

Epoch 00003: val_acc improved from 0.50526 to 0.59158, saving model to ./model/weights.best_03-0.59.hdf5

Epoch 00003: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 4/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 1.3839 - acc: 0.5357 - val_loss: 1.9968 - val_acc: 0.5305

Epoch 00004: val_acc did not improve from 0.59158

Epoch 00004: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 5/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 1.2802 - acc: 0.5673 - val_loss: 1.3310 - val_acc: 0.6042

Epoch 00005: val_acc improved from 0.59158 to 0.60421, saving model to ./model/weights.best_05-0.60.hdf5

Epoch 00005: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 6/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 1.1244 - acc: 0.6234 - val_loss: 1.9959 - val_acc: 0.4737

Epoch 00006: val_acc did not improve from 0.60421

Epoch 00006: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 7/35
57/57 [==============================] - 136s 2s/step - loss: 0.9713 - acc: 0.6744 - val_loss: 1.0211 - val_acc: 0.6653

Epoch 00007: val_acc improved from 0.60421 to 0.66526, saving model to ./model/weights.best_07-0.67.hdf5

Epoch 00007: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 8/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 0.8747 - acc: 0.6980 - val_loss: 1.2936 - val_acc: 0.5958

Epoch 00008: val_acc did not improve from 0.66526

Epoch 00008: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 9/35
57/57 [==============================] - 136s 2s/step - loss: 0.8478 - acc: 0.7149 - val_loss: 1.8586 - val_acc: 0.5368

Epoch 00009: val_acc did not improve from 0.66526

Epoch 00009: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 10/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 0.7773 - acc: 0.7485 - val_loss: 1.2088 - val_acc: 0.6337

Epoch 00010: val_acc did not improve from 0.66526

Epoch 00010: ReduceLROnPlateau reducing learning rate to 0.0004000000189989805.

Epoch 00010: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 11/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 0.6556 - acc: 0.7811 - val_loss: 0.7743 - val_acc: 0.7474

Epoch 00011: val_acc improved from 0.66526 to 0.74737, saving model to ./model/weights.best_11-0.75.hdf5

Epoch 00011: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 12/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 0.6052 - acc: 0.7906 - val_loss: 0.5163 - val_acc: 0.8126

Epoch 00012: val_acc improved from 0.74737 to 0.81263, saving model to ./model/weights.best_12-0.81.hdf5

Epoch 00012: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 13/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 0.5896 - acc: 0.8044 - val_loss: 0.7790 - val_acc: 0.7242

Epoch 00013: val_acc did not improve from 0.81263

Epoch 00013: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 14/35
57/57 [==============================] - 136s 2s/step - loss: 0.5546 - acc: 0.8112 - val_loss: 0.4168 - val_acc: 0.8611

Epoch 00014: val_acc improved from 0.81263 to 0.86105, saving model to ./model/weights.best_14-0.86.hdf5

Epoch 00014: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 15/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 0.5266 - acc: 0.8241 - val_loss: 0.4183 - val_acc: 0.8505

Epoch 00015: val_acc did not improve from 0.86105

Epoch 00015: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 16/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 0.5353 - acc: 0.8196 - val_loss: 0.4565 - val_acc: 0.8400

Epoch 00016: val_acc did not improve from 0.86105

Epoch 00016: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 17/35
57/57 [==============================] - 136s 2s/step - loss: 0.5198 - acc: 0.8213 - val_loss: 0.3826 - val_acc: 0.8568

Epoch 00017: val_acc did not improve from 0.86105

Epoch 00017: ReduceLROnPlateau reducing learning rate to 0.00016000000759959222.

Epoch 00017: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 18/35
57/57 [==============================] - 137s 2s/step - loss: 0.4561 - acc: 0.8409 - val_loss: 0.3909 - val_acc: 0.8716

Epoch 00018: val_acc improved from 0.86105 to 0.87158, saving model to ./model/weights.best_18-0.87.hdf5

Epoch 00018: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 19/35
57/57 [==============================] - 136s 2s/step - loss: 0.4215 - acc: 0.8557 - val_loss: 0.3398 - val_acc: 0.8779

Epoch 00019: val_acc improved from 0.87158 to 0.87789, saving model to ./model/weights.best_19-0.88.hdf5

Epoch 00019: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 20/35
57/57 [==============================] - 136s 2s/step - loss: 0.4329 - acc: 0.8463 - val_loss: 0.3847 - val_acc: 0.8674

Epoch 00020: val_acc did not improve from 0.87789

Epoch 00020: saving model to ./model/weights.last_auto4.hdf5

查看部分结果

利用CNN训练模型的时候发现，在kaggle kernel上的结果很好，初始acc就达到0.97，但在本地电脑和Linux服务器上的结果就很差，初始acc只有0.06，在本地电脑上训练，acc可以慢慢增长，在第一轮训练到四分之一的时候达到0.6，但在服务器上的结果一直在0.1上下徘徊，后来将参数steps_per_epoch改为（train_size/batch_size）后，效果变好一点，如上，最高的val_acc达到0.91（第34、35轮）。原因可能是kaggle的kernel里加载了之前训练过的模型，事实上要训练一个表现不错的CNN模型需要花很久，所以fine-tune，如加载imagenet的模型权重（已经具有不错的信息抽取能力）可以提高训练效率。Kera的应用模块Application提供了带有预训练权重的Keras模型，这些模型可以用来进行预测、特征提取和finetune。方案二就是利用Xception来进行训练。

方案二：Xception

部分结果：

Epoch 1/100
267/267 [==============================] - 213s 798ms/step - loss: 1.9894 - acc: 0.3535 - val_loss: 2.9473 - val_a

Epoch 00001: val_acc improved from -inf to 0.49474, saving model to ./model_Xception/weights.best_01-0.49.hdf5

Epoch 00001: saving model to ./model_Xception/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 2/100
267/267 [==============================] - 202s 755ms/step - loss: 1.0212 - acc: 0.6881 - val_loss: 2.3308 - val_a

Epoch 00002: val_acc improved from 0.49474 to 0.65053, saving model to ./model_Xception/weights.best_02-0.65.hdf5

Epoch 00002: saving model to ./model_Xception/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 3/100
267/267 [==============================] - 201s 753ms/step - loss: 0.6963 - acc: 0.7791 - val_loss: 0.6494 - val_a

Epoch 00003: val_acc improved from 0.65053 to 0.80000, saving model to ./model_Xception/weights.best_03-0.80.hdf5

Epoch 00003: saving model to ./model_Xception/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 4/100
267/267 [==============================] - 201s 752ms/step - loss: 0.5558 - acc: 0.8252 - val_loss: 1.6157 - val_a

Epoch 00004: val_acc did not improve from 0.80000

Epoch 00004: saving model to ./model_Xception/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 5/100
267/267 [==============================] - 200s 751ms/step - loss: 0.4825 - acc: 0.8448 - val_loss: 0.4034 - val_a

Epoch 00005: val_acc improved from 0.80000 to 0.87158, saving model to ./model_Xception/weights.best_05-0.87.hdf5

Epoch 00005: saving model to ./model_Xception/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 6/100
267/267 [==============================] - 200s 751ms/step - loss: 0.4225 - acc: 0.8636 - val_loss: 0.4724 - val_a

Epoch 00006: val_acc did not improve from 0.87158

Epoch 00006: saving model to ./model_Xception/weights.last_auto4.hdf5
Epoch 7/100
144/267 [===============>..............] - ETA: 1:31 - loss: 0.4090 - acc: 0.8685

查看部分结果

其它：

加载之前训练的模型继续训练：

 1 base_model = Xception(weights=None, input_shape=(ScaleTo, ScaleTo, 3), include_top=False)
 2 x = base_model.output
 3 x = GlobalAveragePooling2D()(x)
 4 x = Dropout(0.5)(x)
 5 x = Dense(1024, activation='relu')(x)
 6 x = Dropout(0.5)(x)
 7 predictions = Dense(num_classes, activation='softmax')(x)
 8 
 9 model = Model(inputs=base_model.input, outputs=predictions)
10 model.load_weights('./model_Xception/weights.best_07-0.89.hdf5')
11 model.compile(optimizer='Adadelta',
12               loss='categorical_crossentropy',
13               metrics=['accuracy'])

4. 评估模型

4.1 从文档加载模型

1. 利用numpy.savez将训练时的分割后数据保存，以备后用：

np.savez('Data.npz', trainX=trainX, testX=testX, trainY=trainY, testY=testY)

2. 加载数据、训练好的模型权重：此处的数据和模型要按照训练时的处理

# compile model
model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])


d = np.load("./Data.npz")
# d = dict(zip(("trainY","testY","testX", "trainX"), (data[k] for k in data)))
trainX = d['trainX']
testX = d['testX']
trainY = d['trainY']
testY = d['testY']

#print(trainX.shape, testX.shape, trainY.shape, testY.shape)

model.load_weights('./model/weights.best_35-0.91.hdf5')

predY = model.predict(testX)
np.savez('cnn_predY.npz', y = predY)
print(model.evaluate(trainX, trainY))  # Evaluate on train set
print(model.evaluate(testX, testY))  # Evaluate on test set

3. 输出结果：

4275/4275 [==============================] - 35s 8ms/step
[0.2199308500791851, 0.9174269007102788]
475/475 [==============================] - 4s 8ms/step
[0.23087565186776612, 0.9094736845869767]

4.2 混淆矩阵

from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix
confusionMTX = confusion_matrix(trueY, predYClasses)

方案一：CNN

4.3 Get results

model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.load_weights('./model/weights.best_35-0.91.hdf5')

# prediction
pred = model.predict(clearTestImg)

# Write result to file
predNum = np.argmax(pred, axis=1)

le_classes = np.load('plantLabelEncoder_classes.npz')
predStr = le_classes['arr_0']

res = {'file': testId, 'species': predStr[predNum]}
res = pd.DataFrame(res)
res.to_csv("res.csv", index=False)

—————————————————————————————————

参考：

1. https://www.kaggle.com/gaborvecsei/plant-seedlings-fun-with-computer-vision

2. https://blog.csdn.net/yeahDeDiQiZhang/article/details/79541040

3. https://www.kaggle.com/gaborvecsei/plants-t-sne

4. https://www.kaggle.com/nikkonst/plant-seedlings-with-cnn-and-image-processing

5. 形态学处理 https://blog.csdn.net/sunny2038/article/details/9137759

6. opencv中的cv2.getStructuring(): https://blog.csdn.net/u012193416/article/details/79312972

7. python opencv入门形态学转换（13）：https://blog.csdn.net/tengfei461807914/article/details/76242362

8. https://www.jianshu.com/p/05ef50ac89ac

相关阅读:
敏感词过滤
 Tarjan+topsort(DP)【P3387】 [模板]缩点
 树状数组【CF703D】Mishka and Interesting sum
组合数学+错排问题【p4071】[SDOI2016]排列计数
 Dijkstra【p3003(bzoj2100)】[USACO10DEC]苹果交货Apple Delivery
Trie树【p2264】情书
 线段树+扫描线【p1884】[Usaco12FEB]过度种植（银）Overplanting …
区间DP【p4290】[HAOI2008]玩具取名
 暴力【p4092】[HEOI2016/TJOI2016]树
 暴力【p4098】[HEOI2013]ALO
原文地址：https://www.cnblogs.com/expttt/p/9323876.html