• 对比Media Foundation 和DirectShow


    http://blog.csdn.net/zhaobisha/archive/2008/08/01/2752622.aspx

    我们已经跨入了对高清数字媒体时代。未来的数字高清将无处不在。但是他非常需要健壮的保护,而这是当前的数字媒体平台所不具备的。Media Fundation就是为了这个而存在。
            让我们审视高清数字,这个平台需要很有弹性,便于从小故障下恢复。需要考虑大量的不同品质的video 和audio.Media Foundation就是为了这个而存在。比如,支持下一代的HD技术:
      1:DirectX 视频加速(DXVA) 2.0提供了比DXVA1.0更高效率的视频加速,更稳定,最新的视频解码能力,和扩展的硬件视频加速。在DXVA2.0下,windows可以直接处理某些高清内容,并容易错误恢复。
    2:Color-space能得以保存在整个视频处理流程中,所以中途可以无转换损失,用户可以享受到高逼真的画质。这个也能减少CPU等消耗。
    3:增强的视频渲染器(enchanced video render EVR)增强了视频处理和时钟等。

            让我们研究一下文件保护,在用户购买了一部电影之后,他可以把电影传到他的某个设备上(一些设备支持直接在播放的时候录制),这个过程中会有多种保护模式,购买后的使用保护,播放时防录制保护,复制保护,如果某一个保护没有正确完成,就会使整套保护没有了意义。所以这需要有一个无缝的平台去相互协作。Media Foundation就是为了这个而存在。
            最后,让我们来总览一下DirectShow. DirectShow的API对这些数字高清媒体的应用程序确实是非常通用的,万能的,但是,DirectShow作为一个10多年的老技术而言已经力不从心了。比如:
       1:流程是静态static的,所以实现动态的Graph和Major format change是非常困难的。
      2:DirectShow filter的线程模型是非常复杂的,要完全理解并永不出错是太困难了。
      3:DirectShow filter只能用于DirectShow。
      4:DirectShow不支持文件保护。
      作为DirectShow的接替者,Media Foundation出现了,他不会马上替代DirectShow,作为第一步,他将在vista上慢慢展露他的影响。
      但是目前为止,Media Foundation只能在媒体保护(Proteced media process))方面大施手脚,还未向DirectShow进行足够的扩展和替代。


    Appendix: Feature Comparisons

    The following table compares the features of Media Foundation with those of DirectShow.

    Feature
    group Feature Media
    Foundation DirectShow
    Basic functionality Audio and video rendering Yes Yes
      Event notification Yes Yes
      Device enumeration No Yes
      Component enumeration Yes Yes
      Synchronization to reference clock Yes Yes
      Seeking Yes Yes
      Improved stress resilience Yes No
    Content protection Component validation Yes No
      Content protection policy negotiation Yes No
      Interoperability between content protection technologies Yes No
      Protection against kernel-mode and user-mode threats Yes No
      Component revocation and renewal Yes No
      Video output protection management Yes Yes
    Media tasks Audio capture No Yes
      Video capture No Yes
      Video editing No Yes
      DVD playback and navigation No Yes
      MPEG-2 support No Yes
      ASF support No Yes
      TV technologies No Yes
      Stream buffer engine  No Yes
      Encoder API No Yes
    Video renderer Substream mixing using per-pixel or planar alpha blending Yes Yes
      Customizable video composition No Yes
      Support for custom presenters Yes Yes
      Windowless rendering Yes Yes
      Multimonitor support Yes Yes
      DXVA Yes Yes
      DirectDraw exclusive mode Yes Yes
      Backward compatibility with existing applications Yes Yes
      Accurate frame stepping Yes Yes
      Alpha blending of image data Yes Yes
      Glitch resilience Yes No
      Enhanced video fidelity Yes No
      Enhanced content protection robustness Yes No
      Standalone use Yes No
      Standalone mixing component Yes No
    Transforms (MFT or DMO) Synchronous data processing Yes Yes
      Simple programming model Yes Yes
      Standalone use Yes Yes
      Multiple inputs and multiple outputs Yes Yes
      Dynamic number of streams Yes No
      Access to sample-level metadata Yes No
      In-place processing Yes Yes
      Dynamic format changes Yes No
      Quality adjustment Yes No
      Rate change  Yes No

    The following table compares the features of Media Foundation with those of the Windows Media Format SDK.

    Feature
    group Feature Media
    Foundation Format SDK
    ASF file features Audio and video streams Yes Yes
      Image streams No Yes
      Arbitrary streams (text, file, Web, custom data) No Yes
      Script commands No Yes
      Data unit extensions Yes Yes
      SMPTE time code support No Yes
      Mutual exclusion Yes Yes
      Stream prioritization Yes Yes
      Bandwidth sharing No Yes
      Indexes Yes Yes
      Markers Yes Yes
      Multiple bit rate stream Yes Yes
      Multiple language support Yes Yes
    Codec features CBR encoding Yes Yes
      VBR encoding Yes Yes
      Two-pass encoding Yes Yes
      High-resolution audio support Yes Yes
      Low delay audio Yes Yes
      S/PDIF audio output Yes Yes
      Video image Yes Yes
      Device conformance template Yes Yes
      Video complexity settings Yes Yes
      Frame interpolation Yes Yes
      DirectX Video Acceleration  Yes Yes
    File writing Video resizing Yes Yes
      Color space conversion Yes Yes
      Audio resampling Yes Yes
      ASF file sink  Yes Yes
      Network sinks No Yes
      Push sinks No Yes
      Watermarking support No Yes
      Input formats, input settings, and data unit extensions Yes Yes
      WMA smart recompression No Yes
      Multichannel audio Yes Yes
    File reading User-allocated sample support No Yes
      Synchronous reading No Yes
      Output format enumeration Yes Yes
      Multichannel audio Yes Yes
      MP3 support Yes Yes
      Network sources Yes Yes
    Metadata  ID3 support No Yes
      Custom metadata Yes Yes
    Digital rights management Live DRM No Yes
      DRM Individualization Yes Yes
      Back up and restore DRM licenses Yes Yes
      View DRM attributes in the Metadata Editor Yes Yes
      Output protection levels Yes Yes
      License revocation Yes Yes
      Windows Media DRM for Network Devices Yes Yes
      Secure Audio Path No Yes
      Playlist burning Yes Yes
      Third-party transcription support Yes No
      Local license issuance Yes No
      Enhanced Windows Media DRM renewability Yes No

  • 相关阅读:
    根据人脸关键点实现平面三角剖分和最近邻搜索 ( KNN, K=1 ), opencv3.4.2, C++
    KDTree  C++实现
    python 保留小数
    Clion提示:Single-argument constructors must be marked explicitly to avoid unintentional implicit conversions 解法办法
    二叉搜索树的C++ 实现
    排列组合之组合问题 网易深度学习工程师面试题 C++ 使用10方法
    OS X 安装命令行看图工具 chafa 以及其依赖libtool
    leetcode704 C++ 72ms 二分查找
    Deep Interest Network for Click-Through Rate Prediction
    归并排序
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/carl2380/p/1934305.html
Copyright © 2020-2023  润新知