• [ES6] 03. The let keyword -- 1


    var message = "Hi";
    {
       var message = "Bye";       
    }
    
    console.log(message); 
    
    //Bye

    The message inside the block still has impact on the outside.

    Just remember that something like for, while if ... block, they don't create new scope. function block do create new scope!

    If you add function around the inside message:

    var message = "Hi";
    
    function greeting(){
        var message = "Bye";
    }
    
    console.log(message);
    
    //Hi

    Then "Bye" message has no impact on the "Hi" message.

    But if create something like "for", "while" loop and if block, you will still get the "Bye";

    Let


    To help with this problem, we do have LET in ES6, which will allow me to use block scoping.

    let message = "Hi";
    {
        let message = "Bye";
    }
    
    console.log(message);
    
    //Hi

    This "Bye" message, because it's inside of a block, even though it's not inside of a function, has no impact on the assignment of this message. They are two separate and different entities.

    So we con consider that "let" keyword will create a new scope in the current block!

    Let in For Loop:


    Recall one problem code:

    var fs = [];
    
    for(var i = 0; i < 10; i++){
        fs.push(function(i){
             console.log(i)   
        });
    }
    
    fs.forEach(function(f){
        f();
    });
    
    //10
    //10
    ...
    //10

    The output will be 10 all the time.

    If we swtich var to let:

    var fs = [];
    
    for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++){
        fs.push(function(i){
             console.log(i)   
        });
    }
    
    fs.forEach(function(f){
        f();
    });
    
    //0
    //1
    ...
    //9

    Then the output is 0-9. The reason for that is because, let keyword each time it create a new instance in for loop.

    What this really means in the end is that if you're used to bringing your variables up to the top of a scope using VAR and things like VAR i, VAR temp, where you want to be careful, because you're afraid of wasting behaviors due to this i.

    function varFun(){
        
        var previous = 0;
        var current = 1;
        var i;
        var temp;
    
        for(i = 0; i < 10; i++){
              temp = previous;
              previous = current;
              current = temp + current;
        }
    }
    
    
    function letFun(){
    
        let previous = 0;
        let current = 1;
    
        for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++){
            let temp = previous;
            previous= current;
            current = temp + current;
        }
    }

    Feel free now to use the LET keyword, and instead of declaring it at the top, you can declare it in line, inside of the FOR statement, as well as declaring it inside of the FOR block, and it'll safely create this temp each time it goes through the FOR block.

    Using let instead of var prevents variable declarations from being moved to the top of the scope on what is known as hositing.

  • 相关阅读:
    NPOI操作EXCEL
    几个英文的数学概念
    C#中将鼠标光标变为忙碌状态
    C#使用Linq to Sqlite
    SSM-SpringMVC-25:SpringMVC异常顶级之自定义异常解析器
    SSM-SpringMVC-24:SpringMVC异常高级之自定义异常
    SSM-SpringMVC-23:SpringMVC中初探异常解析器
    SSM-SpringMVC-22:SpringMVC中转发(forward)和重定向(redirect)
    SSM-SpringMVC-21:SpringMVC中处理器方法之返回值Object篇
    jQuery-01:on live bind delegate
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/Answer1215/p/4109464.html
Copyright © 2020-2023  润新知